KENTUCKY FACE* PROJECT
ANNUAL REPORT
2001

KENTUCKY INJURY PREVENTION AND RESEARCH CENTER
*Fatality Assessment
and Control Evaluation
Cooperative
Agreement Number U60/CCU409879-07/08
The Kentucky Fatality Assessment and Control
Evaluation (KY FACE) Project is an occupational fatality surveillance project
of the Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center (KIPRC)*. Its primary purposes are to
collect data on work-related fatalities and to develop prevention strategies
and interventions, which are disseminated to employers, workers, agencies with
interests in public health, and others who may be in a position to effect
change. The goal of FACE is to
prevent fatal work injuries by studying the work environment, the worker, the
task the worker was performing, the tools the worker was using, the energy
exchange resulting in fatal injury, and the role of management in controlling
how these factors interact. FACE investigators evaluate information from multiple sources
that may include interviews of employers, workers, and other investigators;
examination and measurement of the fatality site and related equipment; and
review of records such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), police, and medical
examiner reports, and employer safety procedures, and training plans. The FACE program does not seek to determine
fault or place blame on companies or individual workers. Findings are summarized in narrative
reports that include recommendations for preventing similar events in the
future.
For more detailed
information concerning KY FACE, or to obtain additional copies of this report,
contact:
Terry Bunn, PhD, Project
Manager
Kentucky Injury Prevention
and Research Center
333 Waller Avenue, Suite 202
Lexington, KY 40504-2915
TEL: (859) 257-4955
FAX: (859) 257-3909
www.kiprc.uky.edu
*Organizationally,
KIPRC is part of the University of Kentucky School of Public Health. It maintains a contractual relationship with
the Kentucky Department for Public Health (KDPH). Funding for the KY FACE Project is from a cooperative agreement
between the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and
KDPH that is subsequently contracted to KIPRC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROGRESS TOWARD PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES
PREVENTION/INTERVENTION
ACTIVITIES
Average
Time of Death After Injury
Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL)
Future Aims of Kentucky FACE
Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROGRESS TOWARD PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM
INVESTIGATION
PROGRAM
PREVENTION/INTERVENTION ACTIVITIES
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Notification of Cases
When and Where
Demographics
Industry
Occupation
External Cause of Death
SPECIAL TOPICS
Agricultural Fatalities
Motor Vehicle Crashes (MVCs)
Homicides
Women
Out-of-State Residents
Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL)
REFERENCES
Appendix A – Case Report
Appendix B – Report Request Form
Appendix C – Presentation
Evaluation
Appendix D – Fatalities By County
1996-2000 (map)
Page
Table 1. Survey of
Governor’s Safety & Health Conference FACE Presentation
Attendees 13
Table 2. Initial sources of
notification for the Year 2001 14
Table 3. Fatality Rates for Counties with the
Greatest Frequency of
Occupational Fatalities in 2001 19
Table 4. Fatality Rates and
Numbers for Counties Experiencing a Fatality in 2001 20
Table 5. Demographic Characteristics of All
Kentucky Occupational Deaths, 2001 22
Table 6. Occupational
Fatalities by Industry, 2001 25
Table 7. Work-related
Fatalities by Occupation in 2001 33
Table 8. Fatal vs. Nonfatal
Workplace Injuries by Gender in the U.S 42
Table 9. Fatal vs. Nonfatal
Workplace Injuries by Gender in Kentucky 43
Table 10. Demographics of
Female Occupational
Fatalities in Kentucky for
the Year 2001 44
Table 11. The Number of
Female Fatalities by Industry and Occupation Division
in Kentucky for 2001 45
Table 12. Length of Time
(> 24 hours) Between Injury and Death in 2001 46
Table 13. Total and Average
YPLL by Industry Classification for 2001 48
Table
14. Future Lost Wages Due to Work-related Fatalities by Industry. 49
Page
Figure
1. Time of
Initial notification of Occupational Fatality in 2001 15
Figure 2. Kentucky
Occupational Fatalities by Month of Death 15
Figure
3. Occupational
Fatality Numbers
by Day of the Week 17
Figure 4. Occupational Fatality Numbers by Time of Day 17
Figure 5. Number of Occupational Fatalities in Kentucky per
Area
Development District (ADD) 18
Figure 6. Fatalities by Industry for
the Year 2001 24
Figure 7. Occupational
Fatality Rates in
the Mining, Ag/Forest./Fish.,
TCPU, and Construction Industries 26
Figure
8. Occupational Fatality
Rates in the Retail/Wholesale Trade,
Services, Public Administration, and Manufacturing
Industries 26
Figure 9. Transp./Commun. & Public Utilities
Occupational Fatalities- Year 2001 27
Figure 10. Construction
Fatalities for the Year 2001 27
Figure 11.
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing Fatalities for Year 2001 28
Figure 12. Manufacturing
Deaths in Year 2001 28
Figure 13. Services
Industries Deaths in the Year 2001 29
Figure 14. Public
Administration Occupational Fatalities for the Year 2001 29
Figure 15. Mining Industry
Occupational Fatalities
for the Year 2001 30
Figure 16.
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Industry Fatalities for the Year 2001 30
Figure 17. Wholesale Trade
Industry Occupational Deaths for the Year 2001 31
Figure 18. Retail Trade
Industry Occupational Fatalities for the Year 2001 31
Figure
19. Fatalities by External Cause of Death 32
Figure 20. Operators/Fabricators/Laborers Occupational Deaths
in 2001 35
Figure 21.
Farming/Forestry/Fishing Occupational Deaths in 2001 36
Figure 22. Precision
Products/Craft/Repair
Occupational Deaths in 2001 36
Figure 23. Service
Occupational Deaths in 2001 37
Figure 24. Military
Occupational deaths in 2001 37
Figure
25. Technical/Sales/Administrative Support
Occupational Fatalities in 2001 38
Figure 26.
Managerial/Professional Specialty Occupational Deaths in 2001 38
Figure 27. Total Years of Potential Life Lost
(YPLL) in Kentucky, 1997-2001 47
During 2001, KY FACE staff identified and recorded 112
occupational fatalities. The categories
designated by NIOSH as eligible for field investigation during this period were
youth fatalitiesworkers
(<18 years old), highway work zone deathss, and
machinery-related incidents.
In addition to investigative and data management activities,
the following are
some of
the notable accomplishments of the KY FACE Project during its
eighth year:
·
Kentucky’s occupational fatality
rate is elevated (6
deaths/ 100,000 workers) compared to the U.S. occupational fatality rateFACE data
requests increased 12% from the year.
(4 deaths/ 100,000
workers).
· Although the total years of potential life lost (YPLL) has decreased in Kentucky since 1997, lost wages in those occupations with fatalities totaled $74.4 million in 2001.
·
Male workers die as a result of motor vehicle
collisions or falls, whereas female workers die due to motor vehicle collisions
or by homicide.
·
A new FACE brochure was developed and disseminated.
· A one page “flyer” was developed and distributed to 120 County Extension Agents promoting the use of Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) and seat belts on tractors.
Oral presentations were made at the annual
Coroner’s Conference in April of 2001 and the Governor’s Safety and Health
Conference in May of 2001 and May of 2002.
· A significant number of articles were published and include the following:
a) Struttmann
TW, Brandt VA, Morgan SE, Piercy LRPiercy LR, Cole HP.
(2001) Equipment dealers’ perceptions of a community based ROPS campaign. Journal of Rural Health 17(2):131-139.
b) Struttmann TW, Scheerer A. (2001). Fatal injuries caused by logs rolling off trucks: Kentucky 1994-1998. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 39:203-208.
c) Brandt VA, Struttmann TW, Cole HP, Piercy LR. (2001) Delivering health and safety education messages for part-time farmers through local businesses and employers. Journal of Agromedicine pp.23-30.
a)d)Morgan, SE Cole, HP,
Struttman, T & Piercy, LR. (2001) Stories or Statistics? Farmers’ Attitudes
Toward Messages in an Agricultural Safety Campaign. (submitt ed)
Scheerer, A, Brandt, V. (2001) Interviews with Widows Following Fatal Farming Incidents. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 7(2):75-87.
Following are some of the goals that were set by KY FACE
staff at the beginning of 2001, and, for each, a
brief evaluation of progress made:
Objective 1) Continue working with the Labor Department’s Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), coroners, State Police, and other agencies to ensure that a minimum of occupational fatalities go unreported.
Frequent comparisons of findings with the Labor Department’s Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) program indicate that KY FACE is missing no cases, and, in fact at times, reveals cases previously unknown to CFOI. Also, frequent contact is made with county coroners to confirm or reject possible cases. In addition, contact has been made with the records section of the Kentucky State Police Headquarters to begin receiving electronic motor vehicle collision data quarterly, to confirm and identify new occupational motor vehicle fatalities occurring within the state of Kentucky and to facilitate more timely data analysis and generation of safety and prevention materials.
Objective 2) Complete First Reports and Supplements (when appropriate) on all occupational fatalities and transmit data to NIOSH in an accurate and timely fashion.
First reports and supplements, as
well as data transfer to NIOSH, have been completed in an accurate and timely
fashion. NIOSH has developed
new software using Microsoft Access to enter and transmit data. The new software wais adequate but
there weare
problems associated with non-targeted case definitions. With the NIOSH
database, up to 65% of cases weare defined as
being caused by “other” means of death, therefore, vital variables necessary
for data analysis weare
missing or incomplete. We have been involved in the FACE coordination committee to discuss and
resolve this and other issues. We will continue to utilize our database, Epi-Info
for initial first report entry followed by a repeat entry into the NIOSH
database until a decision is made whether to upgrade the NIOSH database or not.
It
was decided during the last teleconference on May 29, 2002 that the use of the NIOSH database would be discontinued and that each
state would maintain their own database. To facilitate the smooth transition into either the Epi Info or the Microsoft Access databases, which are currently used, user group meetings will
be held at the FACE annual meeting in 2002. Also, a list will be compiled by
NIOSH and
distributed to all states that contains the core variables to code
occupational fatalities in order to attain uniformity between states.
Objective 3) Complete at least 18 on-site investigations of occupational fatalities in designated categories during FY01.
Due
to staff changes, position vacancies, and the nature of the occupational
fatalities occurring in Kentucky during this fiscal year, only 45 cases were
investigated in 2001so far
with final draft reports
prepared in 2002. One case was machineryconstruction-related,
involving the release of an excavator bucket from a quick connector coupler.
The second case,case machinery-involved,
was a result of of a construction related fall from scaffoldingbeing
pinned by a piece of machinery against a pillar. The third case
involved the death of a juvenile riding as a passenger, as a result of a
tractor overturn while farming. The fourth case was a machinery-related crushing
incident. The fifth case occurred when a construction worker was killed after a
crane overturned on him. A fourth case resulted in the death of a juvenile while driving a
golf cart. All
five
cases were deemed worthy of investigation due to the unique
circumstances involved and the future prevention materials that can be
generated from the data collected for each case investigation. A new
investigator, Medearis
Robertson,
was hired in May 2002 so we anticipate that the number of case investigations
will increase to the projected
number for the next fiscal year.
Objective 4) Continue to develop and expand dissemination methods to communicate FACE results, program activities, goals, and priorities.
a) a) FACE staff
(and others) responded to 47 requests for FACE data for the fiscal year 2001-2002, which is approximately the same as in
2000-20001slightly more than the previous year at this time
(42), indicating continued and increasing
awareness of the existence of KY FACE and interest in the project’s results.
b) b) Tim
Struttmann taught an Agriculture Safety class and Occupational Medicine 602
course geared towards medical
residents and MPH students at the University of Kentucky that relied
heavily on KY FACE data acquired over the years.
c) c) The
Community Partners for Healthy Farming Project has continued to use KY FACE
data in the development of agricultural safety information, particularly
messages designed to increase the number of farmers retrofitting their
tractors with rollover protective structures.
d) Tim Struttmann discussed the KY FACE Project and Mike Pope presented case history/investigation information on 00KY096 to a class of University of KY MPH students and medical residents on 1-16-01.
e) A new FACE brochure was developed and sent to all 120 County
Coroner’s offices
along with a FACE the Facts sheets from 2000 and 20011999 data. Land laminated
guideline sheets for determining if a death was work related were also developed..
f) A one page “flyer” was developed and distributed to all 120 County
Extension Agents soliciting their help in promoting the retrofit and/or use of
Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) and seat belts on tractors. The same “flyer” was also modified to target
the end user and was distributed at a farm safety day.
g) A HazAlert publication addressing measures to prevent hyperthermia during the summer was disseminated to the Bricklayers & Allied Crafts Local Union, the Carpenter’s Local Union, the Teamsters Local Union, the Lexington Migrant Network Coalition and Cooperative Extension offices.
Objective 5) Submit abstracts to professional meetings and publish results.
Oral presentations were made at the annual Coroner’s Conference in April of 2001 and the Governor’s Safety and Health Conference in May of 2001 and May 2002.
Objective 6) Write article based on occupational fatality data in Kentucky to be submitted to peer-reviewed journal (CFOI vs. FACE analysis, data linkage project).
This
specific objective was not met but
has been carried over for the next fiscal year with modifications (FACE and
FARS data linkage) andwith
the appointment of a research assistant dedicated to this project who commenced work
in May 2002.
Other articles related to
FACE data were written/published (or are in press) and are as follows:
·
Struttmann TW, Brandt VA,
Morgan SE, Piercy LR, Cole HP. (2001) Equipment dealers’ perceptions of a
community based ROPS campaign. Journal of
Rural Health 17(2):131-139.
Other articles related to FACE data were
written/published (or are in press) and are as follows:
Struttmann TW, Brandt VA, Morgan SE, Piercy LR,
Cole HP. (2001) Equipment dealers’ perceptions of a community based ROPS
campaign. Journal of
Rural Health 17(2):131-139.
·
Struttmann TW,
Scheerer A. (2001). Fatal injuries caused by logs rolling off trucks: Kentucky
1994-1998. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 39:203-208.
·
8.
·
BBrandt
VA, Struttmann TW, Cole HP, Piercy LR. (2001) Delivering health and safety
education messages for
part-time farmers through local businesses and employers. Journal of
Agromedicine pp.23-30.
·
Scheerer, A, Struttman, TW. (2002) Carbon Monoxide
Poisoning in Kentucky. Journal of the Kentucky
Medical Association (in press)
·
StruttmanStruttmann, TW, Reed, DK (2002) Injuries to
Tobacco Farmers in Kentucky. Southern Medical Journal (in press)
·
Morgan, SE Cole, HP, StruttmanStruttmann, T &
Piercy, LR. (2001) Stories or Statistics? Farmers’ Attitudes Toward Messages in
an Agricultural Safety Campaign. (submitted)
·
Reed, DK, StruttmanStruttmann, TW (2002) Fatal Incidents Involving
Farm Equipment on Public Roadways. (in preparation)
·
StruttmanStruttmann, T, Perkins, D, Huitink, G (2002)
Summary of Deaths and Injuries in Arkansas Agricultural. (in preparation)
Objective 7) Hire and train a new Field Investigator.
We have hired a FACE Field Investigator in May 2002. She is receiving training presently and will begin new case investigations as NIOSH priority incidents occur. Both Terry Bunn and the new Field Investigator, Medearis Robertson will attend NIOSH investigator training in Morgantown when offered.
Objective 8) Finish qualitative analysis of survivors’ interviews and publish data.
This has been completed and an article has been written and published:
C Scheerer, A, Brandt, V. (2001) Interviews with Widows Following Fatal Farming Incidents. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 7(2):75-87.
During state fiscal year 2001-2002, the KY FACE Project maintained and expanded its network of notification sources and relationships formed in its prior years of operation. The following is a list of currently active sources:
C County coroners and deputy coroners
C Kentucky Department of Labor
C Kentucky Labor Cabinet, Occupational Safety and Health (OSH)
C Community Partners for Healthy Farming (CPHF) Project
C State Vital Statistics Registrar
C Emergency Medical Services offices
C Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Prevention (SCAHIP)
C
Kentucky State Police, Fatal Accident Reporting
System (FARS)
C
County Cooperative Extension offices
C
Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
C
Print and electronic media news reports
CKentucky
State Police, Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS)
County Cooperative Extension
offices
Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
Print and electronic media
news reports
The KY FACE Project continueds to conduct
on-site investigations of selected occupational fatalities during the fiscal year
2001-2002 which feall
into the NIOSH-designated categories of machinery related incidents, highway
work zones and youth workers (<18 years).
Investigation case reports for the
following lowing cases
were initiated in 2001 and completed in 2002. Investigations Yfor the year
2001 investigations included
(check
out) a3
machinery-related incidents, a construction-related fall, and 2a youth
incidents. The first
youth incident involved the death ofing a person
riding as a passenger on a tractor performing farmwork (see Appendix A.) and involved a
tractor overturn. The
second youth death occurred when a golf course employee was killed after being thrown
from a golf cart. Summaries of
these incidents are as follows:
·
A 16-year-old female was killed after the tractor on
which she was riding as a passenger overturned. She was a high school student; farmed on evenings
and weekends. The tractor was being driven by a 20-year-old friend while
baling hay on a farm at dusk. The driver and the victimthe victim had been
baling hay all day, and both were experienced farmers. The victim was seated on
the fender to the left of the driver. The tractor was a 1969 tricycle-tired3-point
John Deere, which was well maintained but was not equipped with a Roll Over
Protective Structure (ROPS) or a seatbelt. The tires were appropriately fluid filled, however
the two tires were adjusted so that they were touching. The driver
was reversing the tractor down a slight slope in an open field in order to stab
a bale of hay with an
attached hydraulic (?) hayfork.
The right rear wheel ran over the hay bale cuasingcausing the tractor to
overturn side-ways on top of the victim and the driver. The driver was pushed
clear by one of the tractor’s rotating wheels. The victim was pinned underneath
the tractor’s driver seat and died of compression asphyxiation.
·A 48-year-old maintenance
technician ( the victim) was killed when he
was trapped between a touret punch press table and a pole. His shift started at
6 am and he had began work at approximately 6:15
am. The incident occurred approximately 15 minutes after initiation of work. He
working with the machine
·
A 44-year-old construction worker (victim) was
killed when a 36-inch-wide bucket weighing more than 1000 pounds, detached from
its quick release coupler and fell from an excavator, landing on him as he was
working in a trench. The victim and
another worker had been in the trench preparing it for a pre-formed concrete
manhole that they were about to install.
Their supervisor (the excavator operator) sat and waited in the
excavator, with the engine running, and the bucket raised a few feet above
ground level so that it would be out of the way. The second man in the trench had just turned away from the victim
when he heard a “click” and turned back to see the bucket fall. He attempted to move the bucket, but could
not. He and the excavator operator used
the excavator and a chain to remove the bucket and then called for help. The victim was pronounced dead at the scene
upon arrival of emergency medical workers.
·
A fifteen-year-old golf course worker (the victim)
was killed when the utility golf cart he was operating overturned. The victim was employed by the golf club on
which he and his family resided and had driven the utility golf cart to his
home, located at the top of a hill, to change clothes. Before leaving work for his residence, he
contacted a friend who then came to his house on a regular course golf cart
(not a utility cart). The victim
changed clothes and the victim and his friend left the victim’s home, each
driving their respective carts and via public and golf course roadways,
traveled downhill towards the
clubhouse. As they descended the hill, they were
reportedly racing when the victim lost control of his cart; it left the roadway
and struck a pile of dirt. The vehicle
became airborne over a small creek, rotated in the air, and the victim landed
on his head on the opposite side of the creek.
Emergency medical services (EMS) was contacted. A physician on the course at the time
arrived at the scene and assisted the EMS team. Efforts to revive the victim
failed and he was pronounced dead in the ambulance, while still on the scene.
·
A 62 year-old male brick
mason (victim) died after he fell approximately 55 feet through masonry
scaffolding. He worked for a masonry
subcontracting company that was contracted through another construction company
to do the masonry work on a new building.
The victim was performing ongoing work laying brick at the construction
site. At approximately 7:15 AM the
victim entered the building he was bricking and ascended to the 4th
floor where he reached his workstation.
He stepped out of an opening from the building onto the scaffolding
outside. As he did so, he stepped over
two mason board’s (20 inches combined width) which were closest to the building
and onto the first one of three materials board’s (10 inches wide) located in
the middle of the scaffolding. The
board he stepped onto broke and he fell 55 feet. He died approximately one hour later at a nearby hospital of
multiple blunt force injuries.
Upon completion of each
investigation report (example, Appendix A) A), copies are
provided to the employer, if applicable, to the coroner involved, and to any
witnesses or others who assisted with the investigation. These reports are also available to others (e.g., presentation audiences) via a
request form or the KIPRC website. A sample
form is included as Appendix B.
FACE Hazard Alerts, newsletters and
other NIOSH handouts were distributed at several statewide conferencesstatewide conferences
and meetings, (reaching many target audiences,
including safety and health professionals, coroners, emergency medical service
and laboratory personnel, industrial workers and the agricultural community). Moreover, newsletters and Hazard Alerts were
circulated in the Kentucky Lt. Governor’s office, the Kentucky Department for Public
Health, the Kentucky Labor Ccabinet and the
Central Laboratory Facility. In addition, prevention materials were
periodically distributed to the state’s 120 county extension agents, postage
free, through the UK Department of Agriculture, which distributes packets
weekly to all agents.
To reach specific target populations, the distribution of Hazard Alerts included the Bricklayers Local Union, the Carpenter’s Local Union,
the Teamsters Local Union, the Migrant Network Coalition, and Cooperative
Extension agents.
FACE staff members made oral
presentations to the State Coroners'’ Association on April
27, 2001 and at the
Governor’s Safety and Health Conference held in May 2001 and May 8-10, 2002. Jane McCammon,
MS, Director of the Denver Field office for at the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was the, invited
speaker of the KY FACE program and spoke to the State Coroners’ Association in May 2001. She
addressed the issue of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning and the need for
carboxyhemoglobin levels as
a measure for accurate determination of CO exposure as the cause of death
in occupational fatalities. At the Governor’s Safety & Health conference (2002), the
presentation included two information delivery formats. First, a slide
presentation outlined
FACEoutlined
FACE program objectives and goals and provided data on demographics,
occupations and industries related to KY occupational fatalities. SecondAfterward,
the audience was divided into three separate groups and three case investigation
scenarios were presented. The groups were prompted to ask questions about their
individual cases,
then
to consider prevention strategies and interventions that may
prevent that specific type of occupational fatality from occurring in the
future. An evaluation of thise type of presentation format revealed that 95% of the attendees thought that the presentation was easy to
understand and 95% of those evaluated believed they better understood the occupational
fatality problem in Kentucky.
Eighty-two percent82% of the conference participants
were unaware of the FACE program before the presentation compared withto
87% who were unaware in
2000. This indicates an
increased awareness of the FACE program over the past years. With the presentation format
utilized, 95% of the attendees thought that the presentation was easy to
understand and 95% of those evaluated believed they better understood the
occupational fatality problem in Kentucky.
Eighty-six percent of conference participants thought the
presentation was valuable to their work and 80% thought the presentation
prompted them to change safety practices at their worksite (compared to 60% surveyed in 2000). Therefore, the prevention strategies and data provided by the FACE program are of considerable utility in
the workplace. TThese
presentations also served
to expand our network of notification sources (27% requested more dissemination
information) and also increased the number of requests
for FACE data. The table 1 below compares survey information from the years 20002 and 20020.
Table 1. Survey of Governor’s
Safety & Health Conference FACE Ppresentation Aattendees1.
|
Year |
Valuable to my work? |
Better understand the occupation |
Easy to understand? |
Prompted me to change work practices? |
Aware of FACE before present.? |
I would like more information. |
|
2000 |
64% |
95% |
90% |
60% |
87% |
n/a |
|
2002 |
86% |
95% |
95% |
80% |
82% |
27% |
1 Numbers represent the percentage of those surveyed (n=33 for year 2000, n=22 for year 2002) that either “strongly agreed” or “agreed” with the survey question asked.
KY FACE also made an oral
presentation in September 2001 at the annual FACE meeting in
Morgantown, WV, about the Roll Over Protective Structure (ROPS) campaign that
was done in KY. “Collaborations with
Academic Partners to Develop and Disseminate FACE-Based Interventions’. With the collaboration of the FACE program and academics, FACE findings were
translated into community based interventions and the publication of
peer-reviewed articles. Community- based interventions included posters, exercises,
meetings and education classes. Furthermore, a logging video was created with the help of the UK
Dept. of Forestry. With the cooperation of the
Spanish department, the rapid translation and posting of FACE fact sheets, alerts, and case
reports in
Spanish were accomplished. A collaborative grant
proposal was written with the Communication Dept., which was unfunded, but served to further advance our collaborations with
that department. The collaboration of the FACE program with a number of departments on the University of
Kentucky campus resulted
in the review and publication of a number of scientific articles.At the
time of the presentation the prevention materials that were developed, field
tested, and revised were available in notebook form. They have since been made available on CD. The primary focus is retrofitting ROPS and
safe tractor operation. These are
‘ready to use’ materials and include PSAs, exercises, simulations, motor
vehicle crash prevention materials, and others. They were designed to be used by local community groups,
including health educators and injury prevention coordinators. The CD contains all materials in both
Microsoft Word format and PDF format.
Copies of the CD are available at no cost by contacting KIPRC at (859)
257-4955, or mpope2@pop.uky.edu.
The educational module developed and initiated in
1995 for coroners and deputy coroners was continued. This is an on-going project related to accurate completion of
death certificates with respect to work-relatedness.
Kentucky FACE identified 1124 fatal
occupational injuries during 20010. The following section provides a descriptive
analysis of the KY FACE data for that year.
Vital Statistics and
newspapersNewspapers comprised the majority of were the most common source
of initial notification sources (Table 21). The Kentucky State Police Fatal Accident Reporting
System (FARS),
formerly a primary notification source, is no longer able to
provide FACE with direct paper FARS reports under a new Federal ruling which states that no information be
coded and
distributed containing
personal identifiers such as names, addresses, or specific crash locations. FACE will begin receiving
motor vehicle collision reports, without personal identifiers, from the Kentucky State Police quarterly. Those fatalities determined
to be work related
can then be selected for analysis.
FACE
was informed of 44 42 percent of occupational fatalitythe cases
within two days (Figure 1), compared to 4458 percent in 20001999. After a case was identified, other sources
were used to gather additional details about the fatal incident, including
death certificates, Mining
Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) reports, and autopsy and toxicology
reports. Interviews
with ccoroners, employers, law enforcement
officers, Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
reports, autopsy and toxicology reports, and
interviews with witnesses and family members were completed as well during
investigations.
Table 21. Initial Sources of Notification for the Year 2001.
Lexington Herald Leader
newspaperNewspapers 2249%
Louisville Courier Journal
newspaperVital Statistics 1224%
Vital StatisticsKY State
Police Fatal Accident
Reporting System
(FARS) 365%
Coroners 4%
CFOIKentucky
Department of Labor 1314%
Community Partners for Healthy Farming 1%
Medical
Examiner 1%
MSHA 1%
OtherNIOSH 21%
Figure 1. Time of Initial Notification
of Occupational Fatality in 2001.

Figure 2 shows the number of fatalities that occurred each
month during the year. While it
had the fewest in 1999, Tthe peak months for fatalities in
20010
were October and
November with 14
fatalities each
followed by May with 12 fatalitiesas February (n=15).
In October, five of the incidents involved farmers- 3 were killed in tractor rollovers, a bull attacked 1, and 1 was accidentally shot with a firearm. Only 2 of the 14 fatalities
for November were farm-related. The spike in October could be explained by the
drier season. More farmwork, such as hay baling and field
preparation, is accomplished in the fall. Four of the fatalities in November
included homicides- two stemmed from a single incident when two police officers
were serving a misdemeanor warrant, one was a shooting of a grocery clerk and
the last incident
involved the
shooting of a former county clerk by the victim’s former employer. This is at least partially due to two multiple
fatality incidents – one that killed four people (plane crash) and one

Figure 2. Kentucky Occupational Fatalities by Month of Death.
that
killed two (explosion). Following
closely behind February were September and October (n=14). TDecember had the
fewest number of occupational
fatalities during 20010
(n=45) were recorded in December. This may be partially due
to the fact that many industries shut down over the holidays; therefore, there
are fewer workdays.
The days of the week occupational fatalities occurred is shown in Figure 3. Surprisingly, Mondays (n= 15) and/or Fridays (n= 13) did not comprise the most frequent days of the week for when the majority of deaths occurred. Most of the occupational fatalities occurred either on a Tuesday (n= 27) or Wednesday (n= 21).
When the time of death was examined, it was determined that the majority of deaths happened during typical work hours between 6am and 6pm (Figure 4). The highest number of occupational fatalities (n= 32) occurred between 10am and 2pm. On both sides of that timeframe, the number of worker deaths followed closely with 25 deaths recorded between 6am and 10am and 29 deaths between 2pm and 6pm. Surprisingly, quite a few occupational fatalities were also observed (n= 16) between 6pm and midnight.

Figure 3. Occupational Fatality Numbers
by Day of Week.

Figure 4. Occupational Fatality Numbers by Time of Day.

Figure 53 shows a map
of Kentucky with the number of work-related fatalities that occurred in each
Area Development District
(ADD). ADD’s are defined as partnerships of local governments, which provide for planned
growth. The KIPDABluegrass
District (the Area Development District that includes the metropolitan Louisville
areaLexington-Fayette County) recordedhad
the most fatalities with 251, followed closely by
the Bluegrass ADDKIDPA
(whichthe
district that includes Lexington-Fayetteouisville – Jefferson
County) with 220, and Big
Sandy with 12.. The lowest number of occupational fatalities was recorded in the FIVCO
district (n= 1), which encompasses the city of Ashland.
Figure 53. Number of Occupational Fatalities in
Kentucky
per Area Development District
(ADD)
(ADD)


HalfSixty-three
of Kentucky’s 120 counties had at least one occupational fatality during 2000.
Jefferson County had the most fatalities with 20sixteen,
followed by FayettePike
Ccounty
with 7seven, Christian and
Pulaski counties with five each, and FloydHarrison,
PikeKenton
and PerryMartin
counties with four each. Jessamine,
Lincoln, and
Daviess counties each recorded 3 occupational
fatalities. Table 32
shows the fatality rate per 100,000 workers for each of these eightseven
counties using employment estimates. Floyd and Perry counties had
very high fatality rates compared to Jefferson and Fayette counties and these
rates are a product of the low number of employed workers
in both counties. It is interesting to note that while Jefferson
County had four times as many fatalities as Martin County, the rate per 100,000
workers in Martin was almost thirty-six times that of Jefferson. This is due to the relatively high number of
employed persons in Jefferson County (368,324) as compared to Martin
(2,719). The number of employed
persons was
12,512 for Floyd and 10, 674 for Perry County, whereas, the number of employed workers for
Jefferson and
Fayette counties
were 372,387 and 143,992,
respectively. A map of Kentucky’s fatalities by county for the
five-year period 1996-2000 can be found in appendix D.
Table
3. Fatality Rates for Counties with the Greatest Frequency
of Occupational Fatalities in 2001.
|
County |
Fatalities |
Employment Numbers* |
Rate per 100,000 Workers |
|
Jefferson |
20 |
372,387 |
5 |
|
Fayette |
7 |
143,992 |
5 |
|
Floyd |
4 |
12,512 |
32 |
|
Pike |
4 |
25,114 |
16 |
|
Perry |
4 |
10,674 |
37 |
|
Jessamine |
3 |
21,101 |
14 |
|
Lincoln |
3 |
11,174 |
27 |
|
Daviess |
3 |
48,121 |
6 |
|
Total KY |
112 |
1,900,116 |
6 |
*County employment estimates
are from the 2001 Kentucky Deskbook of Economic Statistics. Kentucky Cabinet
for Economic Development, Division of Research; Frankfort, KY; 2000.
Fatality numbers and
occupational fatality rates were calculated for all counties experiencing a
fatality in 2001 and are listed in Table 4.
Forty-five of Kentucky’s 120 counties had fatality rates that exceeded the state
average of six per 100,000 workers.
Fatality rates were significantly higher than the nation’s average in several
counties, including Nicholas and Lee (41), and Russell and Perry (37) counties. The high fatality rates are a reflection of the
smaller number of workers within those counties. With the relatively low worker populations, there are notably high
numbers of fatalities.
Table 2.
Fatality Rates for Counties with the Greatest Frequency of Occupational
Fatalities During 2000
County Fatalities Rate per 100,000 workers*
Jefferson 16 4
Pike 7 27
Christian 5 18
Pulaski 5 20
Harrison 4 55
Kenton 4 5
Martin 4 147
Total KY 124 7
*County
employment estimates from the 2000 Kentucky Deskbook of Economic Statistics,
Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development, Division of Research; Frankfort, KY;
2000.
Table 4. Fatality Rates* and Numbers for Counties Experiencing a
Fatality in 2001.
|
County Fatality
Rate (#) |
County Fatality Rate (#) |
County Fatality
Rate (#) |
|
Nicholas 41.14
(1) Lee
41.08 (1) Russell 37.48 (2) Perry 37.47 (4) Trimble 36.62 (1) Fulton 32.29 (1) Floyd 31.97 (4) |
Webster 19.89 (1) Knott 18.73 (1) Bath 17.76 (1) Rockcastle 16.96 (1) Washington 16.87
(1) Grayson 16.69 (2) Fleming 16.39 (1) |
Logan 7.84 (1) Woodford 7.39 (1) Whitley 7.31 (1) Christian 7.20 (2) Marshall 7.14 (1) Greenup 6.38 (1) Daviess 6.23 (3) |
|
Lyon 31.05 (1) Jackson 27.58 (2) Lewis 27.37 (1) Bracken 27.11
(1) Lincoln 26.85
(3) Green 25.88
(1) Breathitt 25.64
(1) |
Pike 15.93 (4) Jessamine 14.22 (3) Harrison 14.10 (1) Garrard 12.97 (1) Graves 11.96 (2) Simpson 11.85 (1) Barren 11.29 (2) |
Calloway 5.82 (1) Hardin 5.64 (2) Madison 5.52 (2) Hopkins 5.49 (1) Jefferson 5.37 (20) Fayette 4.86 (7) Laurel 4.48 (1) |
|
Mason 24.81 (2) McLean 24.12 (1) Owen 23.55 (1) Morgan 21.97 (1) Edmonson 20.54 (1) Carroll 19.90 (1) |
Shelby 11.08 (2) Scott 11.03 (2) Ohio 11.00 (1) Marion 9.43 (1) Mercer 9.20 (1) Muhlenberg 8.53 (1) |
Campbell 4.46 (2) Oldham 3.94 (1) McCracken 3.06 (1) Bullitt 2.95 (1) Boone 2.19 (1) Kenton 1.27 (1) |
*Rates were calculated per
100,000 workers using county employment estimates from the 2001 Kentucky
Deskbook of Economic Statistics, Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development,
Division of Research, KY; 2001.
Fatality rates were calculated for all counties
experiencing a fatality in 2000 and are
listed in Table 3. Forty-six of Kentucky's counties had fatality rates that exceeded
the state average of seven per 100,000 workers. Fatality rates were much higher than Kentucky's average in
several counties, including Martin (147), Harrison (55), Bracken (51), and
Morgan (43) counties. The
relatively low number of workers in each of these counties (Martin – 2,719,
Harrison – 7,250, Bracken – 3,897, and Morgan – 4,692) led to the high fatality
rates, while, on the other hand, Jefferson County, with four to eight times the
number of fatalities, only had a fatality rate of four due to its massive
workforce (368,324 employed persons).
Table 3. Fatality Rates* for Counties Experiencing
a Fatality in 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demographic characteristics of allthe workers
fatally injured on the job are shown in Table 54. Those killed on the job in
2000 were primarily white (83%; 7% were unknown) and male (97%). Ages ranged
from 15 through 93 (one age was unknown), with a median of 44. Most (66%) were married, and at least half
had a high school education or beyond (50% of known; there were 29% unknown
education levels). During 1999, farmers
accounted for 75 percent of those aged 60 and over (n=12), but for 2000, they
accounted for only forty percent of these fatalities (n=8). The oldest, at 93 years old, was, however, a
farmer. While there were four
occupational fatalities in the less than 20 age
group, only one fell into the newly designated NIOSH target area of youth
(<18 years old).Ninety percent of occupational workers killed were
male, and the workers were primarily white (85%). The number of female deaths
increased significantly from the year 2000. Whereas there were only 4 females
deaths in 2000, there were 11 female deaths in 2001. Six percent of worker
deaths were black. The
age of workers
killed ranged from 16 to 97 years. The youngest was a 16-year-old farmer killed
in a tractor overturn and the oldest worker killed was a 97-year-old farmer killed when an automobile struck him as he was walking across the road to
check his cattle.
The median age at
death was 46 years of age. Sixty percent of those killed were married, while 13% and 12%,
respectively, were either unmarried or divorced. Almost half
(45%) were high school graduates and 5% had a college degree. Eighteen percent of workers
killed had less than a high school education. The majority of deaths, as expected, involved people born in the United States,
although two deaths involved workers born in Germany, one was born in Mexico and one was born in Bosnia. Almost all of the decedents spoke English
(90%). One spoke Spanish as the
primary language,
one spoke Bosnian
and one spoke
German.
When in-state vs.
out-of-state resident deaths were examined, fourteen (13%) of the 112 fatal incidents involved
residents of 6 other states who died while working in Kentucky. The
out-of-state residents were from Indiana (n= 7), Alabama (n= 2), Ohio (n= 2),
Missouri (n= 1), South Carolina (n= 1), and West Virginia (n= 1). None of the out-of-sate resident fatalities involved females.
There was no individual industry with a disproportionate number of deaths for out-of-state residents in 2001. The greatest number of
out-of-state residents worked in both the Construction and Transportation industry divisions (n=4 for each).
There were 2 deaths each in the Manufacturing and Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing
industries. In the year 2000, the majority of deaths occurred in the
Transportation industry. The most
common occupation for out-of-state deaths was that of an operator/fabricator/laborer
(n= 8, 57%). The most frequent cause of death involved motor vehicles (43%),
either motor vehicle crashes or being struck by a motor
vehicle.
Table 54. Demographic Characteristics of All Kentucky
Occupational Deaths, 20010
Characteristic Number Percent
Total
Fatalities 11224 100
Sex
Male 10120 907
Female 114 103
Race
White 95103 853
Black 711 69
Other 11 1
Unknown 89 7
American Indian/Alaska
Native 1 1
Age
<20 4 43
20 -– 29 182 1610
30 -– 39 2033 1827
40 -– 49 247 2122
50 -– 59 217 1922
60 -– 69 161 149
70 -– 79 45 44
80-89 23 22
>980> 31 3<1
Marital Status Unknown 1 <1
Marital
Status
Never married 1515 1312
Married 6782 6066
Divorced 1318 1215
Widowed 22 2<1
Unknown 157 136
Education
Less than high school 2026 1821
High school graduate 5041 4533
Some college 1513 1311
College graduate 68 56
Unknown 2136 19
Country of Origin
United
States 101 90
Mexico 1 129
Bosnia 1 1
Germany 2 2
Unknown 7 6
Primary Language
English 101 90
Spanish 1 1
Other 2 2
Unknown 8 7
Table 65 and Figures 6-84 show the
number of workers killed in each industry division (as classified by the Standard Industrial Classification Manual),
as well as a comparison of state and national occupational fatality rates. TheThis year, the division of
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing industryTransportation/Communication/Public
Utilities realized
the majority made up
the largest portion (19%, n=24) of work-related deaths in Kentucky (n= 26, 23%) and.
the occupational
fatality rate for this industry remains more than double the US fatality rate (51 deaths
per 100,000 workers in Kentucky vs. 21 deaths per 100,000 workers nationwide). Manyost (16) of
these fatalities, as one might expect, were Agricultural machinemotor
vehicle- related (seven were due to tractor
rollovers with tractors unequipped with a Roll Over Protective Structure (ROPS)). The fatality rate for this industry is high because
employment numbers for farmers include only full-time farmers, not those who farm
part-time as is the
case in Kentucky.
Hence, the number of those working
in the agriculture industry is underestimated, and therefore, the fatality rate
for this division
is inflated.
The
next highest percentage (2117%,
n=241)
of fatalities occurred in the Transportation/-Communication/Public Utilities Construction (TCPU) industry, which again is pushing
Kentucky’s 2000 fatality rate for Construction 30 percent higher
than the U.S. rate (19
compared to 12). Motor
vehicle collisions, as expected, were the leading cause of
worker deaths in the transportation industry.
The
KY Construction industry
saw 19 deaths
(fatality rate of 16) in 2001, which is 23% above the nationalrate was the same as the
U.S. rate in 1999. fatality rate. The majority of construction fatalities were caused by falls. This past summer,
two deaths in the construction industry occurred as a result of heat exposure and resultant hyperthermia due to the extreme heat and
high humidity conditions at the time. One death was a result of suffocation when the worker became
trapped in a ditch collapse.
There was another huge
increase for 2001
in tThe KY mMining fatality
rate saw
a huge increase for 2000, making it
more than twiceo times
that of the U.S rate. The mining industry The other
significant change worth noting is that the Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing
industry, which is usually the leading KY industry for occupational fatalities,
is third for 2000, with 17 (down from 21 last year). While these fatalities ranked third in number, the
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing industry’s fatality rate in KY was still the
second highest (39/100,000 workers). It should
be noted, however, that the fatality rate for this industry division is
somewhat artificially inflated because employment estimates for farmers include
only those who farm full-time. Since
many of Kentucky’s farmers have other jobs and farm only part-time, the number
of those working in the agriculture industry is underestimated, and therefore,
inflates the fatality rate for this division.
wasKentucky’s
the most
dangerous industry in which to be employed in during 2001, as well as in the year 20000 was the
mining industry. Ten Mining’s
14 fatalities shot its fatality rate up to 55/100,000 workers – more than twice
that of the U.S. rate for this industrymining fatalities were recorded this past year, which is down from the 14 recorded the previous year, but the fatality rate increased by 10 between 2001 and 2000. The
reason the occupational fatality rate increased in 2001 is unclear but fewer people were employed in the Kentucky mining industry (15,500 for 2000; 17,211 in 1999) as referenced by the U.S. DOE-EIA; Coal Industry Annual, 1999-2000, Coal Production, 1979-1992.
Table 65 includes the
percentage of workers employed
in each industry division for comparison withison with
the percentage of occupational
fatalities within
the given industry in each division. This comparison again illustrates the high risk of
working in the mining industry, as this division is comprised of less than two
percent of the workers in Kentucky, yet accounts for eleven percent of the
occupational fatalitieThe highest percentage of employed persons is in the Services industry, followed by the Retail/Wholesale Trade industry
and the Manufacturing industry. All three of those industries
had low fatality numbers and rates, which makes them the safest
industries to work in. In contrast, less than 1% of people are employed by
the mining industrys.
and less than 3% in the agricultural industry
but their
fatality numbers and occupational fatality rates are high, which makes both of those industries more dangerous to
work in.
The cause of death for each
industrial classification are given in figures 9-18. As expected, the majority
of Transportation
as well as Mining
and Services industry
deaths were due to motor vehicle collisions. Ag machines and general machinery caused the
greater number
of Agricultural and Manufacturing industry
fatalities, respectively. Falls constituted
the majority of Construction industry deaths. Homicides were the major cause of death in three
industries in 2001. There were 3 homicides in the Public Administration industry, 1 homicide in
the Finance/Insurance/Real Estate industry and 2 homicides in the Retail Trade
industry. One
suicide was recorded in the Wholesale Trade industry. Suicides are included in our
database if it is determined that the suicide happened on work premises while
the decedent was at work.
When you compare the fatality rates between 2000
and 2001, it is clear that more intervention and prevention measures need to be undertaken in order to
reduce the overall high fatality rates in Kentucky. Areas of concentration and concern include the
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing industry, the TCPU industry, the Construction industry and the
Mining industry. As well, the factors that
contributed to motor vehicle collision, machinery (Ag and other) and homicide related deaths need to be
examined more thoroughly.
Number of
Fatalities Finance/ Ins./ Real Estate Retail/ Wholesale Trade Public Admin. Services Manufacturing Mining Construction TCPU Ag/ Forest./ Fish.

Figure 6. Fatalities By Industry
For The Year 2001.
Table 65. Occupational Fatalities by Industry, 20010 (Rates
calculated per 100,000 workersa)

Number of Percent
of 2000 1999 1998
Industryb Fatalities (%) Employmentc KY Rate KY
Rate KY Rate US Rated
TCPU* 24 (19) 6.3 21 20 20 13
Construction 21 (17) 6.3 18 14 18 14
Ag/Forest/Fishing 17 (14) 2.4 39 50 54 23
Manufacturing 16 (13) 16.7 5 6 5 4
Services 15 (12) 21.7 4 2 2 2
Mining 14 (11) 1.4 55 38 34 25
Retail/Whse
Trade 7 (6) 20.7 2 2 3 3
Public
Administration 6 (5) 13.7 2 6 2 3
Finance/Ins/Real
Estate 4 (3) 4.6 5 1 0 1
Totals 124
(100) 93.8 7 7 6 5
a Percent distribution of employed persons obtained
from 1)
2000 from Geographic
Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1998 (Bulletin 2524). US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; November 1999; 2) 1999 from Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1997 (Bulletin 2515). US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; June 1999; 3) 1998 from Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1996 (Bulletin 2498). US Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; April 1998.1) 2001 from Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1999 (Bulletin
2537). US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; updated August 2001; 2) U.S. DOE-EIA; Coal Industry
Annual, 1993-2000;
3) Kentucky FACE
Project Annual Report 2000. Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, 333
Waller Ave., Suite 202, Lexington, KY 40504-2915.
bOffice of Management and Budget. Standard
Industrial Classification Manual. 1987. Springfield VA: National Technical
Information Service. (NTIS No. PB 87-100012)
cThe industries listed do not equal 100 percent of
employed persons because of rounding and because they do not include private
household workers, and self-employed and unpaid family workers which make up
the remainder of employed persons (6 percent).
d Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary. US
Dept. of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries in
2000Fatal Workplace Injuries in 1997: A Collection of
Data and Analysis (Report 934). US Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries
(CFOI), July 1999.
*Transportation/Communications/Public Utilities

*Transportation/Communication/Public
Utilities
aPercent distribution of
employed persons obtained from Geographic
Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1997 (Bulletin 2515). US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; June 1999.
Fatality Rate Per 100,000
Workers

Figure 7. Occupational
Fatality Rates in the Mining, Ag/Forest./Fish., TCPU, and Construction
Industriesa .
aPercent distribution of employed persons obtained
from Geographic Profile of Employment and
Unemployment, 1999 (Bulletin 2537). US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics; updated August 2001.
Fatality Rate per 100,000
Workers

Figure 8. Occupational
Fatality Rates in the Retail/Wholesale Trade, Services, Public Administration,
and Manufacturing Industriesa.
aPercent distribution of employed persons obtained
from Geographic Profile of Employment and
Unemployment, 1999 (Bulletin 2537). US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics; updated August 2001.
Figures 5-14 show the
external cause(s) of death for work-related fatalities by industry. Out of the ten industry divisions, motor
vehicle crashes (MVCs) were the leading or second leading cause of death in all
but three. Firearms and machinery were
also causes of death in most industries.
Air transport, the second most common external cause of death for 1999,
was not as common in 2000, although a single incident was responsible for all
four Finance/Insurance/Real Estate fatalities.
Figure
9. Transportation/ Communication & Public Utilities Occupational
Fatalities- Year 2001.
Figure 5



Machine Poisoning Suicide Number of
Fatalities
Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure
10. Construction Fatalities for the Year 2001.
Number of
Fatalities


Figure
11. Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing Fatalities for Year 2001.


Number of
Fatalities

Figure
12. Manufacturing Deaths in Year 2001.

Number of
Fatalities
Figure 13. Services Industries Deaths in the Year 2001.

Number of
Fatalities
Figure
14. Public Administration Occupational Fatalities for the Year 2001.
Number of
Fatalities

Figure 15. Mining Industry Occupational
Fatalities for the Year 2001.
Number of Fatalities

Figure 16. Finance/
Insurance/ Real Estate Industry Fatalities for the Year 2001.
Number of Fatalities

Figure
17.
Wholesale Trade Industry Occupational Deaths for the Year 2001.

Number of Fatalities
Figure
18. Retail Trade Industry Occupational Fatalities for the Year 2001.
Number of Fatalities

Figure 19 shows the external cause(s) of death for work-related
fatalities as
classified by E-code according to the International Classification of
Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Motor vehicle crashes
(MVCs) were the leading cause of occupational deaths (20%) in 2001. The number of motor vehicle collision deaths was
decreased in 2001
to 22 compared to 39 (33%) deaths in the year 2000. The decreased number
observed in 2001 is most likely due to the fact that the classification of a motor vehicle
collision fatality is now divided further into 2 specific categories. Motor
vehicle collision fatalities are now separated into those that occur either to a person while within a vehicle or to a person struck by a
vehicle, whereas, both were included in the
same category in previous years in both the Kentucky and national FACE databases. Being struck by an object (n= 14) and falls (n= 13) followed as being the second (13%) and third (12%) major causes of occupational deaths. Ag machine related fatalities (n= 12) still ranked among the principal external
causes of death
(11%) as well as deaths due to
other machines. Eight occupational homicides
and 4 suicides were recorded. Explosions and
electrocutions accounted for 4 work-related deaths each. Three occupational fatalities each occurred due to suffocation
and to overexertion/ heat
exhaustion.
Targeted interventions aimed at motor vehicle
collision, being struck by something, falls, and machinery deaths warrant further
investigation. A case control study examining motor vehicle collisions is currently underway and the hope is
that new risk factors, which contribute to
these fatalities,
will be identified and elucidated. As well, a recent death involving a fall in the construction industry is the target of a current case investigation.
Prevention strategies based on these data and newly identified cases will be developed,
implemented and
disseminated.
Figure
19. Fatalities by External Cause of Death.
Number of Fatalities


Table
7. Work-related Fatalities by Occupation in 2001.
|
Occupation |
Number(%) |
US
Ratea |
|
Operators,
fabricators, laborers |
36 (34) |
11.7 |
|
Transportation, material moving |
16 (15)
|
22.9 |
|
Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, laborers |
15 (14) |
11.7 |
|
Machine operators, assemblers, inspectors |
5 (5) |
3.2 |
|
Farming,
forestry, fishing |
23 (21) |
23.5 |
|
Precision
production, craft, repair |
22 (20) |
7.6 |
|
Technical,
sales, administrative support |
14 (13) |
1.8 |
|
Managerial,
professional specialty |
6 (5) |
1.6 |
|
Service |
6 (5) |
2.4 |
|
Military |
2 (2) |
|
a
Employment averages obtained from Geographic
Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1999 (Bulletin 2537). US Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics; updated August 2001. Rates were calculated as
the number of occupational fatalities per 100,000 workers.
Figure 12

Figure 13

Figure 14

Table 76
represents
Kentucky work-related fatalities by occupation, classified using the Alphabetical Index of Industries and
Occupations. The Operators/Fabricators/Laborers
occupations accounted for the majority of occupational deaths in Kentucky in
2001 (34%). The
second highest number of deaths was observed in the Farming/Forestry/Fishing occupation (21%). The Precision
Production/Craft/Repair occupations had approximately the same percentage of deaths (20%). The fewest number of deaths
were in the Services and Military
occupations. The proportion of deaths per occupation division is roughly equivalent to
the proportion of occupational deaths recorded in 2000. The US fatality rate is
given for each occupation. Kentucky fatality rates were not calculated because the Kentucky occupational category definitions differ
from the national occupational category definitions.The division of operators/fabricators/laborers accounted
for the largest portion (n=60, 48%) of the
work-related deaths in the state. Over half of the workers killed in this
division were in transportation/material moving (n=32, 53%). The second highest number of deaths occurred
in the farming/forestry/fishing division (n=23, 19%). The majority of these incidents were farming related (n=13, 57%)
or logging/tree trimming related (n=8, 35%).
Figures 15-21 show the leading cause or causes of death for each
occupational division.
The primary cause of death
is listed for the major occupational classes (Figures 20- 26). The most frequent cause of death in the
Operators/Fabricators/Laborers occupation was being struck by something (n= 10) or by motor vehicle collisions (n= 9). Being struck by something (n= 9) also accounted for the
majority of deaths in the Farming/Forestry/Fishing occupation followed by machinery
related causes
(n=6). A high number of deaths in
the Precision Products/Craft/Repair occupation involved falls (n= 5). The Service occupation
recorded three deaths due to homicide and two deaths due to motor vehicle collisions. Motor vehicle collisions (n= 5) were the major cause of death in the Technical/Sales/Administrative support occupation. Both of the deaths that occurred in the Military occupation were a result of machinery and there was no single major cause of death over another for the Managerial/Professional occupation.
Table 6. Work-Related Fatalities by Occupation (Rates
per 100,000 Workersa), 2000
Occupation Number (%) KY Rate US
rateb
Operators,
fabricators, laborers 60 (48) 20 12
Transportation,
material moving 32 (26) 35 24
Handlers,
equipment cleaners,
helpers,
laborers 25 (20) 33 13
Machine
operators, assemblers,
inspectors 3 (2) 2 3
Farming,
forestry, fishing 23 (19) 50* 26
Precision
production, craft, repair 16 (13) 8 8
Technical,
sales, administrative support 9 (7) 2 2
Managerial,
professional specialty 7 (6) 1 2
Service 6 (5) 2 3
Military 3 (2) (c) 8
a Employment averages obtained from Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1998 (Bulletin 2524). US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; November 1999.
b Fatal Workplace Injuries in 1997: A collection of
data and analysis (report 934). US Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census;
July 1999.
c Military population was
unavailable. Therefore a rate could not
be included.
*The fatality rate for farming, forestry, and
fishing occupations is high
partially because of the undercount of workers in this occupation. A more accurate fatality rate for
agricultural workers in Kentucky can be found by using the rate for the
agriculture/forestry/fishing industry.
Figure 15

Figure 16

Figure 17

Figure 18

Figure 19

Figure 20

Figure 21

Figure 22 presents work-related fatalities by
external cause of death as classified by E-code according to the International Classification
of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). Again this year, nearly one-third (n=39) of the fatalities were
due to motor vehicle incidents, making them the leading cause of occupational
fatalities in Kentucky.
The second most common cause of death was due to
being struck by falling objects (10%, n=13), such as trees (loggers) and rocks
(miners). Seven percent (n=9) of the
fatalities were due to agricultural machinery, and ten percent (n=12) were due
to other types of machinery. Homicide, again,
as in 1999, followed agricultural machinery, accounting for 6 percent (n=8) of
the 2000 occupational fatalities.
Figure 20.
Operators/Fabricators/Laborers Occupational Deaths in 2001.

Figure 21.
Farming/Forestry/Fishing Occupational Deaths in 2001.

Figure
22. Precision
Products/Craft/Repair Occupational Deaths in 2001.

Figure
23. Service Occupational Deaths in
2001.

Figure 24. Military Occupational Deaths in 2001.

Figure 25.
Technical/Sales/Administrative Support Occupational Fatalities in 2001.
Figure 26. Managerial/Professional Specialty
Occupational Deaths in 2001.

Air transport, which was the
second leading external cause of death for 1999 after a 1500 percent increase
from the year prior, decreased by nearly half (47%) for 2000. Similar to last year, however, single
incidents were responsible for multiple deaths. All eight air transport fatalities occurred in just two
incidents, both of which were plane crashes, whereas some of the 1999
fatalities also included helicopters.

There were 4 deaths of workers involving falling trees in 2001. One case was of a
construction laborer who was killed when he saved a co-worker from death by pushing him out of the
path of a falling tree but then could not save himself. Other separate deaths occurred when a tree fell on a farmer while cutting and another when a tree fell on a logger during cutting. Of interest, a public
utilities employee died while he was cutting down a dead tree. He had trimmed away most of the branches and had cut halfway through the trunk when the base snapped
and the tree kicked back to kill him. This particular employee had cut thousands of trees before with the same company. All
the workers who
were killed were white males: two were 61-years-old, 1
was 25-years-old, and one was 46-years-old.
Of these four occupational
fatalities, only
one of these workplace incidents involved a logger. The varied incidents observed above illustrate the continued
need for prevention strategies aimed at tree safety not only in the logging industry
but in other industries as well. In the Master Logger program, a trainee is shown
all aspects of logging, including cutting trees safely. This is a very valuable program aimed at
preventing deaths in the logging industry. Further access to worker training by those employees working not only in the logging
industry but also in any industry that involves the cutting down of trees ought to be made available. Tree-cutting videos or
illustrated brochures could be made available either through direct employer training, cooperative extension programs, the local farm bureau, or
through other avenues available to the general public with the focus on safety and the correct way to cut down a tree. One aim of the FACE program for the next year will be
the generation of prevention materials geared toward the general public in applicable industries and
occupations in order to provide education on safe tree cutting.
The high temperature and
high humidity conditions of last summer resulted in 2 occupationally related
deaths due to heat exhaustion and heat exposure. One case involved the death of a carpenter who
became hot after being on the job for a while, sat down and was later
transported to the hospital where he died. The second death occurred when a laborer was stringing fence along a highway. He
collapsed and died at the scene. The heat index (how the temperature feels when the air temperature and
humidity are combined) for the day of the second laborer’s death was 97.
With these two incidents in
mind, a FACE Hazard Alert was generated (Appendix B) this year in order to alert workers of the dangers of
working in extreme heat and elevated humidity conditions by making them aware of the
occupational deaths due to hyperthermia which occurred last year. The Hazard Alert also lists key ways to help prevent hyperthermia, such as drinking plenty of
fluids and taking frequent breaks. The Hazard Alert was distributed to local labor unions and state cooperative
extension offices.
The document was also
translated into
Spanish to target the Hispanic worker population and distributed to the Migrant Network Coalition. The Kentucky Department for Public Health also
served as a distribution point. It is
hoped that with these types
of prevention materials, workers will be alerted to the dangers of working
for long periods of time in heat and high humidity and that deaths to hyperthermia will be prevented.
There were four deaths in Kentucky for 2001, which were attributed to explosions. No Kentucky explosion deaths were recorded for
2000. Nationally, the number of
deaths due to explosions decreased significantly for the year 2000 when compared to the year 1999. Explosion fatalities
accounted for 3% of all fatal injuries for 2000 (U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, in cooperation with State and Federal Agencies, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2000) compared to 3.6% in 1999. There were 76 total occupational fatalities due to explosions in 2000 (99 in 1999), and 30 of those fatalities were attributed
to the explosion of a pressure valve or piping (38 in 1999).
In
Kentucky, one workplace fatality involved a worker who was killed in an oil
tank explosion. The decedent was attempting to thaw a waterline when a nearby fuel
pipe exploded. The worker died minutes later of resultant smoke
inhalation and acute carbon monoxide poisoning. The second work-related death occurred
when a 45-year
old male gas company employee was investigating an oil spill. The decedent was attempting to turn off power
at a pumping
station when a spark ignited drip gas, a constituent element of crude oil, and caused an explosion. It was believed that high humidity conditions might have contributed to the fatality by retaining
rather than dispersing the gas fumes in the soil. The second explosion case resulted in 3rd
degree burns over 96% of the body surface and the victim died three days later.
A third occupational fatality involved a steam line rupture which killed a 48-year old male energy plant worker. The rupture caused an
explosion and the worker fell to another level. The employee, a painter/insulator who had worked for the same employer for
more than 20 years, died of massive head trauma as a result of the explosion. A fourth explosion death happened at a fuel loading plant when a kerosene tank
exploded killing the victim instantly. The victim was a 41-year-old male safety supervisor who worked
for a fuel tank repair business. This case was not investigated but the newspaper
article listed the
cause of the explosion as unknown. For 2000, Kentucky saw a
decrease in both the number (n=8), and the percentage of total occupational
fatalities (6%) due to homicide. This
continued the downward trend that began in 1998 (1997, n=17; 1998, n=12; 1999,
n=9). While the number of homicides had
dropped in 1998, the percentage of occupational fatalities remained the same as
1997 (11%) because of the overall drop in fatalities (1997, n=150; 1998,
n=107). Figure 8 and Figure 9 depict
total number of fatalities per year and occupational homicides as percent of
total occupational fatalities.
The above-described cases serve as examples of the safety precautions, which should be heeded in the workplace area when working with or near explosive materials. These cases were not
investigated since they were deemed NOT to be within the NIOSH FACE priority research areas but general prevention measures might be
applied to these types of situations. Based on a report out of Alberta, Canada (www3.gov.ab.ca/hre/whs/fatalities/pdf/FR-1999-10-27b.pdf),
one typical
prevention recommendation might be that a worker should thoroughly check the entire work zone for possible
flammable materials when an ignition source is to be used. Included in this
recommendation may be to monitor air and other surfaces, such as the ground or a tank, for explosive materials when
entering a work zone. Another recommendation would be to self-contain equipment when repairs need to be
made. In light of
these types of exposure
incidents, efforts will be made by the
FACE program to develop prevention materials aimed at reducing the number of
occupational fatalities due to explosions.

The number of women in the national workforce has increased
dramatically over the past several years. In the year 2000, 59,352,000 women and 68,580,000 men were employed (age 20 and above) compared to
51,328,000 women who were employed in the year 1992 (U.S. Dept. of Labor, Current Population Survey,
2000). With the increased number of
employed women, it
would be expected that female work-related injuries would also increase.
However, the number of female work-related injuries has
decreased somewhat
(Table 8). There were 556,000 women and 1,097,000 men injured at work in 2000 compared
to 558,000 women and 1,129,000 men who were injured in 1999. When injury percentages are compared between women and men, the percentage of women injured while working on the job is
almost one-half the percentage of men injured (0.937% of women and 1.6% of
men). This may be
partly attributed to
the nature of employment in males vs. females. Men are more likely to be
employed in the craft,
operator and laborer occupations while women are primarily employed in the
clerical and services occupations (Monthly Labor
Review, April 1997). Female occupational fatalities nationwide numbered 448 in 2000 while male fatalities
numbered 5,467 (U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State and Federal Agencies, Census of
Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2000). The percentage of female fatalities when compared
to male fatalities differs by more than ten-fold (0.755% of employed women
compared to 7.972% of employed men). Similar to non-fatal injuries, this may more reflect the differences in the types of work performed by both
sexes.
Nationwide, in females, the major cause of death was either due to a motor vehicle collision or to a homicide while the major cause of death in
males was due to a motor vehicle collision
and/or by falls. In
Kentucky, the
number and proportion of females who died
while working in the year 2001 increased significantly from the previous year (Table 9). Whereas only 4 women died in 2000
while working, 11 women died on the job in 2001. Out of those 11 deaths, the majority were motor vehicle related which parallels the majority of female occupational fatalities nationwide. This last year, there was an elevated number
of female deaths due to homicide (n= 3), which accounted for almost
half of the total occupational homicides in Kentucky for 2001. Of the 11 total female
deaths, 5 involved motor vehicle collisions, 3
were a result of homicides, 1 was an
incident involving a worker who slipped on a wet floor, 1 was a youth farmer involved in a tractor
overturn, and 1 involved a coal miner who was struck by a diesel scoop.
The demographics of the
female occupational deaths follow in Table 10 below. Eighty-two percent of female fatalities were white,
and most were
married (36%) and between the ages of 30- 39 (36%) years. The majority of the women killed possessed a high school education (45%), were born in the United
States and spoke English (91%).
There was no specific
industry where a
clear majority of women employed died (Table 11). Three of the female deaths were in the Transportation/Communications/Public
Utilities industry and 2 deaths were in the Retail/Wholesale Trade industry.
One death each was observed in other industries including
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing, Finance, Manufacturing, Mining Public
Administration, and Services. The occupations of the female decedents varied as
well. The majority were in Sales (n= 3), 2 each were in Administrative
Support/Clerical and Service.
Other occupations with one fatality each included
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing, Precision Product/Craft/Repair, Technicians and
related support, and one of an unknown occupation.
Based on these data and the national data, the FACE program will
continue to examine the specific factors which contribute to female occupational fatalities in Kentucky. Deaths by motor vehicle collisions and
by homicide in females will receive particular
attention and will be more thoroughly
investigated in case
control studies. The
first case control study of motor
vehicle collisions was
previously
mentioned as a
new project for the upcoming fiscal year. Another upcoming case control study will examine the issue of gender and
violence in the workplace. As new risk factors emerge, prevention strategies
will be developed which
aim at prevention and
reduction of
female occupational fatalities.
Table 8. Fatal vs. Nonfatal Workplace Injuries by Gender in the U.S.
|
Year |
# Employeda |
# Workplace Injuriesb |
Workplace Injury Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
# Occupational Fatalitiesc |
Occupational Fatality Rate (#/100,000 Workers) |
|
1997 |
66,524,000 |
1,228,000 |
1846 |
5743 |
8.6 |
|
1998 |
67,134,000 |
1,159,000 |
1726 |
5544 |
8.3 |
|
1999 |
67,761,000 |
1,129,000 |
1666 |
5582 |
8.2 |
|
2000 |
68,580,000 |
1,097,000 |
1600 |
5467 |
8.0 |
Women
|
Year |
# Employeda |
# Workplace Injuriesb |
Workplace Injury Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
# Occupational Fatalitiesc |
Occupational Fatality Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
|
1997 |
57,647,000 |
605,589 |
1050 |
475 |
0.8 |
|
1998 |
57,278,000 |
571,341 |
998 |
482 |
0.8 |
|
1999 |
58,655,000 |
558,127 |
952 |
441 |
0.8 |
|
2000 |
59,352,000 |
555,722 |
936 |
448 |
0.8 |
a Total number of women or men
20 years old and over employed (U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey.
Web: stats.bls.gov).
b Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work by selected worker characteristics and industry division, 2000, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.
c Fatal occupational injuries by worker characteristics and event or exposure, 2000, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State and Federal agencies, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries.
Table 9. Fatal vs. Nonfatal Workplace Injuries by
Gender in Kentucky.
Men
|
Year |
# Employeda |
# Workplace Injuriesb |
Workplace Injury Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
# Occupational Fatalitiesc |
Occupational Fatality Rate (#/100,000 Workers) |
|
1997 |
964,000 |
22,248 |
2308 |
133 |
13.80 |
|
1998 |
986,000 |
20,050 |
2033 |
111 |
11.26 |
|
1999 |
954,000 |
19,457 |
2040 |
111 |
11.64 |
|
2000 |
1,003,000 |
20,685 |
2062 |
120 |
11.97 |
Women
|
Year |
# Employeda |
# Workplace Injuriesb |
Workplace Injury Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
# Occupational Fatalitiesc |
Occupational Fatality Rate (#/100,000 workers) |
|
1997 |
860,000 |
11,428 |
1329 |
13 |
1.51 |
|
1998 |
849,000 |
9,828 |
1158 |
6 |
0.71 |
|
1999 |
765,000 |
10,945 |
1431 |
6 |
0.78 |
|
2000 |
897,000 |
10,800 |
1204 |
4 |
0.45 |
a Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment,
1997,
1998, 1999, 2000, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, June
1999.
b Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses
involving days away from work by selected
worker and case characteristics and industry, Kentucky,
private industry, 1992-2000, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, US Department of Labor, May 22, 2002.
Table 10. Demographics Of Female Occupational
Fatalities In Kentucky For The Year 2001.
Characteristics Number Percent
Total Fatalities 11 100
Race
White
9 82
Unknown
2 18
Age
Less 20 1 9
20 – 29 2 18
30 – 39 4 36
40 – 49 1 9
50 – 59 3 27
Marital Status
Married 4 36
Never Married 3 27
Divorced
3 27
Unknown 1 9
Education
Less than High
School 1 9
High School 5 45
Some College 2 18
College
1 9
Unknown 2 18
Country of Origin
United States 10 91
Unknown 1 9
Primary Language
English 10
91
Unknown 1 9
Table 11. The Number of Female Fatalities by Industry and Occupation Division in Kentucky for 2001.
|
Industry |
Number of Fatalities |
|
Agriculture/Forestry Fishing |
1 |
|
Finance |
1 |
|
Manufacturing |
1 |
|
Mining |
1 |
|
Public Administration |
1 |
|
Retail/Wholesale Trade |
2 |
|
Services |
1 |
|
Transportation/Communications/Public Utilities |
3 |
|
Occupation |
Number of Fatalities |
|
Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing |
1 |
|
Administrative Support/Clerical |
2 |
|
Precision Product/Craft/Repair |
1 |
|
Sales |
3 |
|
Service |
2 |
|
Technicians and Related Support |
1 |
|
Unknown |
1 |
Four women were killed on the job during 2000,
fewer than each of the previous 3 years.
Table 9 briefly describes these four women and how they died.
Table 9. Female Occupational Fatalities, 2000
Case Age/Occupation/External Cause of Death
1A
47-year-old travel coordinator was killed in an airplane crash.
1A
39-year-old maintenance worker was shot by her estranged husband as she exited
an apartment that she had been cleaning.
1A
47-year-old cosmetologist shot herself with a handgun while at work.
1A
45-year-old truck driver was killed when the truck she was driving left the
roadway and overturned.
Along with the drop in number of female
occupational fatalities, their representation in both homicide and suicide as
causes of death became less prominent as well.
While they do continue to be represented in both homicide and suicide as
external causes of death, the percentage of these fatalities compared to the
number of overall occupational fatalities is more symmetric. Women accounted for only three percent of
the total occupational fatalities for 2000 and 13 percent (n=1) of the 8
homicides. Men on the other hand,
accounted for 97 percent of all occupational fatalities and 87 percent (n=7) of
the homicides. Although homicides were
responsible for 25 percent of the female occupational fatalities, they
accounted for just six percent of the male fatalities. This statement is at least partly explained
by the fact that males tend to work in other dangerous occupations, such as
operating heavy equipment, more often than females. Suicide, as well, is over represented by women. In 2000 there were 5 suicides, one of which
was a woman. Therefore, 25 percent of
female workplace fatalities were suicides, whereas only three percent of male
fatalities fell into this category.
Twenty-nine (23%) of the fatal incidents involved
residents of 16 other states who died while working in Kentucky. Table 10 provides more detailed information
about this group of workers. The highest number of out-of-state residents
worked in the TCPU industry division (n=11); all of these workers were truck
drivers, except one who worked in construction, and another who worked on
communications towers. Like 1999, the
most common cause of death was motor vehicle crashes (38%), with air transport
ranking second (28%).
Most workers died within 1
day of being injured at work in Kentucky (87.5%). There were 14 people (12.5%) in 2001 that died more than 24 hours
after being injured on the job. In Table 12, the number of days, the occupation and
circumstances of
the occupational fatalities which resulted in
a death more than 24 hours after the
incident are shown. There is no relation between a
certain occupation or cause of death and the interval between injury and death.
|
# of Days Between Injury and Death |
# of Deaths |
Decedent’s Occupation |
Cause of Death |
|
1 |
1 |
Truck Driver |
Jumped from out-of-control truck |
|
2 |
1 |
Construction worker |
Heat exhaustion |
|
3 |
4 |
1.Public utilities employee 2. farmer 3.business owner 4.retail salesperson |
1.gas drip explosion 2.Fall 3.Fall 4.Fall |
|
5 |
1 |
Nursing assistant |
Motor vehicle collision (MVC) |
|
6 |
1 |
Carpenter |
Electrocution |
|
7 |
1 |
Truck driver |
Suicide |
|
8 |
1 |
Highway laborer |
MVC vs. pedestrian |
|
10 |
1 |
Farmer |
Run over by tractor |
|
14 |
1 |
Forklift operator |
Crushed by forklift |
|
15 |
1 |
Police officer |
Shot in the line of duty |
|
35 |
1 |
Truck driver |
MVC |
s
Table 12. Length of Time (>
24 hours) Between Injury and Death Table 10.
Occupational Fatalities Involving Non-Kentucky Residents, 2000
Characteristic Number (%)
Total Non-KY Residents 29 (100)
Sex
Male 27 (93)
Female 2 (7)
Race
White 20 (69)
Black 5 (17)
Unknown 3 (10)
Other 1 (3)
Industry
TCPU 11 (38)
Services 5 (18)
Finance/Insurance/Real
Estate 4 (14)
Mining 3 (10)
Public Administration 3 (10)
Construction 2 (7)
Wholesale/Retail
Trade 1 (3)
Occupation
Operators/Fabricators/Laborers 17 (59)
Technical/Sales/Administrative 5 (18)
Managerial/Professional 3 (10)
Military 3 (10)
Precision
Production/Craft/Repair 1 (3)
External Cause of Death
Motor
Vehicle 11 (38)
Air
Transport 8 (28)
Other
Vehicles 2 (7)
Other
Machines 2 (7)
Self-Inflicted 2 (7)
Fall 2 (7)
Drowning 1
(3)
Struck
By/Against 1 (3)
in 2001.
One
hundred and twelve workers who died in 20010 due to fatal
occupational injuries in Kentucky represent a total of 2, 255522
years of potential life
lost (YPLL) based on age 65, as YPLL is commonly calculated. YPLL is calculated as the
age of worker at death subtracted from the average lifespan. Age 65 is the cutoff age used for analysis here (U.S. Decennial Life Tables
for 1989-1991,
CDC/National Center for Health Statistics, 1997) as opposed to the use of age 85 (average lifespan of 71.8 years for males, 78.8 years for
females), because the rate of death is
much higher between the age of 65 and 85 (CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Report, May 8, 1992). Therefore, YPLL adds more
weight to persons who die at a younger age because their normal death rate is
low. YPLL
calculated with the age of 65 is meaningful to the FACE program because the
average age of retirement from the workforce is 65 so the years of potential
life lost is more aptly termed years of potential employment lost (Struttmann et
al. 1998). There were
11 occupational fatalities
with victims age 65 or over, and one with an
unknown age during 2000 who were not included in
these calculations. The Ttotal YPLL has been
somewhat consistent over the last 5 years decreased somewhat in the
last five years as shown in Figure 275. This decrease in the YPLL
may be attributed to the fact that the median age at time of death has
increased every
year since 1997 (1998- 42 years of age, 1999- 42 years of age, 2000- 44 years of age, 2001- 46
years of age).
This may represent the greater proportion of people at specific ages in the
workforce, such as the large number of baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) currently in
the workforce. Also, the total number of occupational deaths per year has decreased since 1997.
Amazingly, the five-year sum of YPLL for KY
is 13,130.
Figure
27. Total Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) in Kentucky 1997-2001.

In Table 13, the total and average YPLL were calculated per industry division. The industry with the
highest average years
of potential life lost was the Retail/Wholesale trade industry. Another industry with an
increased average YPLL was the Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing industry. Because the average YPLL is
based on the age at death (age 65- age at death), these numbers would indicate that people are dying at a younger age in the above
industries and that
additional worker
safety training in young workers might be recommended.
The industry with the
greatest total number of years of potential life lost, and thus potential employment lost was the Transportation
industry followed by the Construction industry. When the future lost
productivity was calculated for both of these industries (Table 14), it is estimated that the TCPU
industry could lose approximately $18.9 million dollars and the Construction industry could
lose approximately $13.7 million dollars. When all industries are combined, lost future
productivity could total as much as $73.4 million dollars. This substantial total dollar amount is indicative
of the continued need for targeted injury prevention strategies and
interventions.
Table 13. Total and Average YPLL by
Industry Classification for 2001.
|
Industry
Division |
Total
Fatalities |
2001
Total YPLL |
Average
YPLL per
Fatality |
|
TCPU |
24 |
484 |
20.2 |
|
Construction |
19 |
444 |
23.4 |
|
Ag/Forestry/Fishing |
15 |
387 |
25.8 |
|
Manufacturing |
9 |
223 |
24.8 |
|
Retail/Wholesale
Trade |
7 |
200 |
28.6 |
|
Public
Admin. |
7 |
173 |
24.7 |
|
Mining |
9 |
163 |
18.1 |
|
Services |
7 |
135 |
19.3 |
|
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate |
2 |
46 |
23 |
Table 14. Future Lost Wages Due to Work-related
Fatalities by Industry.
|
Industry Division |
Average Salarya |
Total Earnings Lost (in millions) |
% of Total |
|
TCPU |
$ 39,041 |
$ 18.9 |
25.7 |
|
Construction |
$ 30,959 |
$ 13.7 |
18.7 |
|
Manufacturing |
$ 37,615 |
$ 8.4 |
11.4 |
|
Retail-Wholesale
Trade |
$ 37,806 |
$ 7.6 |
10.4 |
|
Ag-For-Fishing |
$ 19,450 |
$ 7.5 |
10.2 |
|
Mining |
$ 43,689 |
$ 7.1 |
9.7 |
|
Public
Administration |
$ 28,954 |
$ 5.0 |
6.8 |
|
Services |
$ 25,954 |
$ 3.5 |
4.8 |
|
Fin-Ins-Real
Estate |
$ 37,467 |
$ 1.7 |
2.3 |
|
Total |
$ 33,418 |
$ 73.4 |
100.0 |
aAverage Salaries from State
and Industry Average Annual Pay 1999-2000 and Percent Change in Pay for all
Covered Workers. U.S.
Bureaus of Labor Statistics.
The next steps for
surveillance of occupational fatalities nationwide should include:
·Standardize core variables
and coding format (Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and FACE)
·Determine if other mortality
surveillance systems collecting similar data need to be continued (National
Traumatic Occupational Fatalities)
·Establish Memorandums of
Understanding (MOUs) among state and federal agencies participating in fatal
occupational injury surveillance regarding data sharing
·Aggregate, interpret, and
disseminate data/information on state/regional/national levels to promote
prevention actions
·Integrate some occupational
questions into field investigations conducted by others who collect data, such
as state police doing homicide investigations or traffic safety personnel doing
traffic fatality investigations
These are adopted from the draft report
“State-Based Surveillance of Work-Related Diseases, Injuries, and Hazards” a
report from the NIOSH-States Surveillance Planning Work Group, March 1999.
The objectives of the Kentucky FACE program are to identify new and emerging
risk factors contributing to fatalities on the job and to develop and
disseminate prevention information and interventions in order to prevent those fatalities
containing the inherent identified associated risk factors. In order to accomplish these
objectives, the
Kentucky FACE program will:
C
Conduct timely and
comprehensive occupational fatality surveillance.
C
Analyze data continuously to
track, identify and elucidate the emergence of new risk factors for
occupational fatalities.
C
Perform timely and accurate case investigations of those
fatalities which
pertain to the research priorities established by NIOSH. Additionally, those incidents involving falling trees,
explosions and
gender-specific occupational homicides will be monitored, investigated and analyzed as specific research priorities in Kentucky.
C
Develop and distribute newsletters, hazard and
safety alerts, fact sheets, case reports and/or intervention materials to those identified target populations determined to
be at greatest risk for occupational injury.
1997 Kentucky Deskbook of
Economic Statistics. 1997. Frankfort, KY:
Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development, Division of Research.
1998 Kentucky Deskbook of
Economic Statistics. 1998. Frankfort, KY:
Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development, Division of Research.
2001 Kentucky Deskbook of Economic Statistics. 2001. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky
Cabinet for Economic Development, Division of Research.
2000
Kentucky Deskbook of Economic Statistics. 2000. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky
Cabinet for Economic Development, Division of Research.
Alphabetical Index of Industries and Occupations.1992. U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Fatal Workplace Injuries in
1993: A collection of data and analysis (Report 891). 1995. US
Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: US Government
Printing Office.
Fatal Workplace Injuries in
1995: A collection of data and analysis (Report 913). 1997. US
Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: US
Government Printing Office.
Fatal Workplace Injuries in
1997: A collection of data and analysis (Report 934). 1999. US
Department of Labor, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: US
Government Printing Office.
Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1995 (Bulletin 2486).
1997. US Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1996 (Bulletin 2498).
1998. US Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Geographic Profile of Employment and
Unemployment, 1997 (Bulletin 2515).
1999. US Department of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment, 1998 (Bulletin 2524). 1999. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). 1993. Los Angeles CA: Practice Management Information Corporation.
Standard Industrial Classification Manual. 1987. Office of Management and Budget. Springfield VA: National Technical Information Service. (NTIS No. PB 87-100012).
Struttmann TW,
Scheerer A, Moon E. Potentially
Productive Years of Life Lost (PPYLL) in Kentucky Due to Occupational
Fatalities, 1994-1996. J KYy Med Assoc.1998;96:369-373.
US Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics. National
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 1996.
News. 8/7/97, USDL #97-266.CDC, Years of Potential Life
Lost Before Age 65 and 85- Untied States, 1989-1990, MMWR 1992; 41(18).
U.S. DOE-EIA; Coal Industry Annual, 1999-2000, Coal Production,
1979-1992.
Geographic Profile of
Employment and Unemployment, 1999 (Bulletin 2537). US Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics; updated August 2001
Kentucky FACE Project Annual Report 2000. Kentucky
Injury Prevention and Research Center, 333 Waller Ave., Suite 202, Lexington,
KY 40504-2915.
Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary. US Dept. of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries in 2000.
Total
Number of women or men 20 years old and over
employed (U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Current Population Survey. Web: stats.bls.gov).
Number of nonfatal occupational injuries and
illnesses involving days away from work by selected worker characteristics and
industry division, 2000, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.
Fatal occupational injuries by worker
characteristics and event or exposure, 2000, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau
of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State and Federal agencies, Census of
Fatal Occupational Injuries.
Number
of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from
work by selected worker and case characteristics and
industry, Kentucky, private industry, 1992-2000, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, US Department of Labor, May 22, 2002.
National Center for Health
Statistics. U.S. decennial lift tables
for 1989-91, vol 1,. no 1. Hyattsville, Maryland. 1997.
---------------------FINAL - For
Administrative Use Only--Limited Distribution--Not for
Publication----------------------
Fatality Public Health
Assessment and KY FACE #00KY051
Control 6 December 2000
Evaluation Project
TO: Michael
Auslander, DVM, MSPH, Kentucky Department for Public Health, Division of
Epidemiology, Surveillance and Investigations Branch
FROM: Mike Pope, DVM, KY FACE Project Manager
SUBJECT: Logger Fatally Injured by Falling Tree
SUMMARY
A 73-year-old male self-employed logger (the
victim) was killed when he presumably was struck on the head by a branch of a
falling tree. He and his son, the only
other logger on site, had finished a break and had been working approximately
30 minutes when the incident occurred.
The son was operating a skidder attached to the base of a tree that had
been cut, but was still standing, nearly vertical, hung in the fork of another
tree. He was pulling the base away from
the stump so that the tree would fall to the ground. The father was watching, waiting for the tree to come down so
that he could begin trimming away the branches. After the tree hit the ground, the son got off of the skidder
intending to help his father trim the branches, but he didn’t see his father. Searching the site, he found his father
unresponsive, slumped forward on his knees, in the branches of the fallen
tree. Since there were no telephones on
site, the son took a van that they had parked in a clearing nearby to call for
help. As he was driving through a
pasture toward the landowners house, he came upon the landowner who was loading
cattle and asked him to go to the house to call 911 so that he could return to
the scene. Upon returning to his
father, the son had to cut away some branches in order to reach him. He moved his father out from under the
branches and held him in his lap, waiting for help to arrive. Emergency medical services (EMS) were
dispatched to the scene after receiving the call at 7:40 a.m., and arrived at
8:00 a.m. One of the EMS workers, also
being a coroner, pronounced the victim dead at the scene, immediately upon
their arrival. In order to prevent
similar instances from occurring, FACE investigators recommend that:
·Loggers should attend the
Master Logger Program for education regarding Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) logging standards and safety procedures.
·A clear escape path should
always be planned when felling a tree and no one except for the person cutting
the tree, or in this case, skidding the tree, should be in the area.
·A hazard assessment of the
logging site should be completed before beginning work to identify and control
potential hazards.
·Appropriate personal
protective equipment (PPE) should be worn at the logging site.
INTRODUCTION
On July 25, 2000, a county coroner notified FACE
investigators of a 73-year-old male logger who had been killed earlier that
morning. An investigator traveled to
the site on July 27 and an interview was conducted with the county coroner who
responded to the scene. The scene was
visited, photographs and measurements were taken, and the landowner was
interviewed. The son was interviewed at
a later date by telephone. A copy of
the coroner’s report and the death certificate were obtained.
INVESTIGATION
The victim was a self-employed logger and had been
logging for about 35 years. He and his
son had been logging this particular tract for about two weeks, and they had
been logging for the same landowner for about a month. The hardwood logs were to be sold at a local
sawmill and the income split with the landowner.
The weather was hot and dry, and had been for some
time. The terrain of this particular
tract was fairly mild, with a slope of less than eight degrees in the immediate
area. Their usual routine involved
arriving at daybreak (about 5:00-5:30 a.m.) and working for a few hours until
it got too hot, usually stopping by noon.
The father usually felled a tree, both the father and the son trimmed
branches, and the son dragged the tree/log to a clearing with a skidder. They typically completed this process for
each tree before beginning another.
Neither wore any personal protective equipment.
On the day of the incident, they arrived at dawn
and worked for about 2 hours before taking a break. Approximately 30 minutes after their break, the son was using the
skidder to free up a 22-inch diameter (at the base) 80 feet tall tree that had
been cut, but had not fallen, due to being caught in the fork of another
tree. He attached a cable from the
skidder to the base of the tree, and pulled the base away from the stump so
that the tree would fall the rest of the way to the ground. The father was
watching, waiting for the tree to come down so that he could begin trimming
away the branches. The tree hit the ground
after the base had moved about 60 feet from the stump. The 35 feet long 11-inch diameter fork of
the second tree in which the first one was stuck broke off and came down as
well. Having successfully felled the tree,
the son stopped
the skidder and got off to help his father trim the
branches, but he didn’t see his father.
Searching the site, he found his father unresponsive, slumped forward on
his knees, in the smaller (1-3 inch diameter) branches of the fallen tree. The
son immediately went to call for help. Since there were no telephones on site,
he took a van that they had parked in the clearing nearby and drove toward the
landowners home to make the call. On
his way, as he was driving through a pasture, he came upon the landowner who
was loading cattle, told him that his father had been struck by a tree and
asked him to go call 911 so that he could return to the scene. The son then returned to his father and
proceeded to extricate him from the branches of the fallen tree, having to cut
some branches with his chain saw to reach him.
Once he had moved his father from the tree branches, he held him in his
lap waiting for help to arrive.
Emergency medical services were dispatched when they received the call
from the landowner at 7:40 a.m., and arrived at the scene at about 8:00
a.m. One of the EMS workers, also being
a County Coroner, pronounced the victim dead at the scene, immediately upon
their arrival. Death was thought to
have been instant or near instant.
CAUSE OF DEATH
The cause of death on the coroner’s report was
depressed skull fracture/cervical spine fracture due to logging accident.
RECOMMENDATIONS/DISCUSSION
Recommendation #1: Loggers
should attend the Master Logger Program for education regarding OSHA logging
standards, safe logging techniques, and best management practices.
Discussion: The
Kentucky Forest Conservation Act requires that as of July 15, 2000 a Kentucky
Master Logger is on-site and in charge of all commercial logging
operations. Master Loggers are also
required to carry their Designation Card with them. Loggers should be aware of OSHA standards and proper logging
techniques to ensure a safe work environment.
In this case, the son was registered for the program but had not yet
attended. The father had not attended
nor did he have plans to attend the program, as the son would serve as the
on-site Master Logger. For more
information about the Kentucky Master Logger Program, contact the Kentucky
Department of Natural Resources (502-564-4496).
Recommendation #2: A clear
escape path should always be planned when felling a tree and no one except for
the person cutting the tree, or in this case, skidding the tree (to complete
its fall), should be in the area.
Discussion: Felling
trees is dangerous, even with the most skilled and/or experienced loggers. A falling tree can strike objects on the way
down or on the ground sending them in unpredictable directions with lethal
force. There is also, of course, the
obvious potential of being struck by the tree that is being felled. As inconvenient as it may sometimes seem, no
one except the feller should be within two tree lengths of the tree being
felled. In fact, OSHA regulations state
that “no employee shall approach a feller closer than two tree lengths of trees
being felled until the feller has acknowledged that it is safe to do so, unless
the employer demonstrates that a team of employees is necessary to manually
fell a particular tree” [29 CFR 1910.266 (h) (1) (iv)]. Another OSHA standard [29 CFR 1910.266 (h)
(1) (v)] states that “no employee shall approach
a mechanical felling
operation closer than two tree lengths of the trees being felled until the
machine operator has acknowledged that it is safe to do so.” These regulations are intended to reduce or
remove the risk of injury from anyone not directly involved with felling the
tree.
Initially, the father was
the feller, and should have been the only one within two tree lengths. However, once the tree became lodged and the
decision was made to use the skidder to complete the task, the only person that
should have been within the two tree length area was the son, since he, as the
machine operator, was now responsible for felling the tree. The father had no reason to be within the
immediate two tree length area while the son brought the tree down with the skidder.
In this incident, it isn’t
clear exactly where the father was standing when the son began pulling the tree
with the skidder. It is clear, however,
that he placed himself in danger by not remaining a safe distance away until
the tree was completely down and the area declared safe (by his son, the
“machine operator”) for his presence.
Being self-employed, the victim wasn’t governed by OSHA regulations -
although following them may have saved his life.
Recommendation #3: A hazard
assessment of the logging site should be completed before beginning work to
identify and control potential hazards.
Discussion: The
logging site should be evaluated for potential hazards such as dead, rotten or
broken limbs and trees (also known as snags or “widowmakers”), as well as
lodged trees and limbs. In addition, a
hazard assessment should include factors such as lean of the tree to be felled,
location of other trees or obstacles in the area, wind conditions, and slope of
the land.
Recommendation #4: Appropriate
personal protective equipment should be worn at the logging site.
Discussion: OSHA
regulations for logging state that employers should provide employees with
appropriate head protection and ensure that it is worn when the employee works
in an area where there is potential for head injury from falling or flying
objects [29 CFR 1910.266 (d) (1) (vi)].
Again, being self-employed, the victim wasn’t governed by OSHA
regulations. However, wearing
appropriate head protection could have lessened the impact of the limbs from
the falling tree and the fatal injury may have been avoided. Although it is not known for certain whether
a hard hat would have prevented this fatal injury, wearing all appropriate PPE
should be practiced by all loggers at the logging site, whether OSHA regulated
or not.
References
Code of Federal Regulations 29 CFR 1910.266, 1999
edition. U.S. Government Printing Office, Office of the Federal Register,
Washington, D.C.
--------------------------------------------------
FINAL --------------------------------------------------
Fatality Public Health
Assessment and KY FACE #00KY096
Control May 22, 2002
Evaluation Project
TO: Michael Auslander, DVM, MSPH, Kentucky Department for Public
Health, Division of Epidemiology, Surveillance and Investigations Branch
FROM: Mike Pope, DVM, KY FACE Project Manager and
Medearis Robertson, KY FACE Field
Investigator
SUBJECT: Construction Worker Dies
After Being Struck by a Falling Excavator Bucket
SUMMARY
A 44-year-old construction
worker (victim) was killed when a 36-inch-wide bucket weighing more than 1000
pounds, detached from its quick release coupler and fell from an excavator,
landing on him as he was working in a trench.
The victim and another worker had been in the trench preparing it for a
pre-formed concrete manhole that they were about to install. Their supervisor (the excavator operator)
sat and waited in the excavator, with the engine running, and the bucket raised
a few feet above ground level so that it would be out of the way. The second man in the trench had just turned
away from the victim when he heard a “click” and turned back to see the bucket
fall. He attempted to move the bucket,
but could not. He and the excavator
operator used the excavator and a chain to remove the bucket and then called
for help. The victim was pronounced
dead at the scene upon arrival of emergency medical workers. In order to prevent similar instances from
occurring, FACE investigators recommend that:
·
Workers should not work under heavy machinery
·
A manual-locking pin, although it would require the
operator to exit the cab or another worker on the ground to disengage, would
dramatically increase the safety of those working with and around the equipment
and should be a part of all quick release couplers. Also, the control panel for quick release couplers for heavy
equipment should have only two positions, lock and unlock. When in the unlock position, there should be
indicator lights as well as audible warnings to alert the operator and others
nearby to the coupler’s status. The
lights
should be mounted in a
highly visible area.
·
All equipment should be maintained properly,
including routine maintenance as recommended by the manufacturer as well as
unscheduled repair and replacement of missing, damaged, or worn parts.
·
Trenches deeper than five feet should have the
walls shored for workers protection.
INTRODUCTION
On November 13, 2000, FACE
investigators were notified of a 44-year-old male construction worker who had
been killed on November 10, 2000, when an excavator bucket released from a
quick connect coupler and fell on him.
On that same day, a telephone interview was conducted with the county
coroner who responded to the scene, and an investigator traveled to the
incident site. Photographs were taken
and the various parties present, which included the construction company’s vice
president, a representative from the coupler’s manufacturer, and an independent
mechanic brought in to test the equipment involved, were interviewed. A copy of the coroner’s report and the death
certificate were obtained, as was a copy of the mechanic’s report.
The victim had been employed
by this particular company off and on for about a year, and had most recently
been with them for about 2 months. The
equipment operator had worked in construction for approximately 30 years. He had been with this company for four years
and had operated the excavator involved in the incident for the same duration. The company was sub-contracting for the
general contractor on this project.
They had been at this location approximately 3 months, and on the
specific task at hand when the incident occurred for about two weeks.
The construction company had
been owned by the current owners for 12 years and employed about 60 full time employees
and approximately another 55 seasonal and part-time employees. They had a written safety manual that was
distributed to all employees upon hiring, and conducted jobsite toolbox safety
meetings weekly as well as company wide safety meetings at company headquarters
monthly. Both the victim and the
equipment operator had received the written safety manual and participated in
the safety meetings.
INVESTIGATION
The workers began their
shift on the day of the incident at 3 p.m., and were scheduled to leave at 10
p.m. The weather was cloudy and the
temperature about 45 degrees. They had
dug a trench with a hydraulic excavator, and were preparing the trench for a
pre-formed concrete manhole that they were about to install. Once they had the trench prepared, they
planned to use the excavator and a chain to hoist the manhole and lower it into
place. Although the quick disconnect
coupler that was installed on the excavator was intended to allow for
situations such as this when it may be desired to remove the bucket for
increased visibility or lifting capacity, they typically did not disconnect the
bucket for this type of procedure unless necessary, and had no intentions of
doing so in this instance. Instead they
planned to use a ring on the bucket to attach the chain. The bucket, in fact, had not been removed
from the excavator for approximately two weeks. There were two men, the victim and a co-worker, in the trench
that were grading and doing final preparations for the manhole, while a third,
the excavator operator,
remained seated in the
excavator waiting for them to finish.
During the approximately 5 minutes of waiting, the excavator’s engine
was running and the bucket was positioned up above ground level, over the
trench, so that it would be out of the way of the men in the trench. The co-worker had turned away when he heard
a click that caused him to re-direct his attention toward the sound just as the
bucket, weighing more than 1000 pounds, fell from the excavator and landed on
the victim. The co-worker attempted to
move the bucket off of the victim, but could not due to its extreme
weight. The excavator operator
attempted to re-connect the bucket to the excavator in order to remove it, but
was unable to align the coupler due to the angle of the bucket in the
trench. Finally, working together, the
excavator operator and the co-worker were able to use a chain and the excavator
to lift the bucket off of the victim, immediately after which, the operator went
and called the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). Although the EMS response time was only about one minute due to
the urban location of the incident, the victim was pronounced dead at the scene
upon arrival.
CAUSE OF DEATH
The cause of death was
listed as multiple blunt force injuries.
RECOMMENDATIONS/DISCUSSION
Recommendation #1: Workers should not work under heavy machinery.
Discussion #1: Kentucky Revised Statute
338.031 (1)(a)1 states that it is an obligation of the employer to
provide a place of employment free from recognized hazards that are causing or
likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees. In this case the employee was exposed to the
hazard of being struck by the excavator bucket. This risk could have been eliminated if the bucket had been swung
away from the trench and lowered to the ground. Workers should be instructed not to position themselves under
elevated machine components.
Recommendation #2: A manual-locking pin,
although it would require the operator to exit the cab or another on the ground
to disengage, would dramatically increase the safety of those working with and
around the equipment and should be a part of all quick release couplers. Also, the control panel for quick release
couplers for heavy equipment should have only two positions, lock and
unlock. When in the unlock position,
there should be indicator lights as well as audible warnings to alert the
operator and others nearby to the coupler’s status. The lights should be mounted in a highly visible area.
Discussion #2: The excavator being used was equipped with a
hydraulic quick release coupler that allows the operator to change buckets or
attachments without leaving the cab.
Although the use of a manually inserted locking pin may be a minor inconvenience,
it would virtually eliminate the potential for inadvertent release of the
bucket. A manually inserted locking pin
would provide backup protection in the event of hydraulic leaks, switch and/or
wiring malfunctions, and unintentional switch movement.
The quick release coupler on
the excavator involved in the incident had a three-position switch mounted in
the cab that controlled the coupler’s locking mechanism. There were positive stops
at the “lock” and “neutral”
positions, and the third position, the “unlock” position springs back to
“neutral.” The neutral position cuts
hydraulic flow to the coupler allowing for maintenance or repair. While the switch for the coupler involved in
this incident did trigger an alarm if the switch was turned to the “unlock”
position, upon release of the switch it would spring back to the “neutral”
position and the alarm would be silenced.
The switch would remain in this position until physically turned to the
“lock” position by the operator. There
also were no indicator lights to show the coupler’s status. Due to the remote location of the switch
(between the seat and the right external wall of the cab, about six inches
below the level of the armrest) and its design, while probably not impossible,
it is highly unlikely that the switch was bumped by the operator, causing the
coupler to release. Also, the warning
alarm never sounded during the incident yet was found to function perfectly in
tests done after the incident, suggesting that the switch was not moved to the
“release” position. In fact, the
excavator passed all tests performed and the cause of the release has not been
determined. Interestingly, the bucket
of this excavator had not been off the machine for approximately two weeks
prior to the incident. One possible
scenario is that the switch could have been, for some unknown reason, in the
“neutral” position without the operator’s knowledge. If turned there from the “lock” position without going to
the “release” position, the coupler
would remain locked. And, although
there is a check valve that prevents the sudden release of hydraulic pressure
on the coupler, and, therefore, an unintentional release, this valve, if left
to hold hydraulic pressure indefinitely, could feasibly allow a gradual leak to
reduce the pressure on the hydraulic lock and eventually allow an unintentional
release of the coupler.
Recommendation #3: All equipment should be
maintained properly, including routine maintenance as recommended by the
manufacturer and unscheduled repair and replacement of missing, damaged, or
worn parts.
Discussion #3: According to the Vice President of the construction
company, the excavator did receive routine maintenance approximately every 200
hours. At the time of the incident, the hydraulic cylinder that
operates the coupler locking mechanism was leaking, but not enough to cause a
problem in the opinions of the coupler representative and the mechanic, and
regardless, was not from the portion of the cylinder responsible for unlocking
the coupler. There were also two
springs on the coupler that were designed to help keep pressure on the coupler
in the event of a loss of hydraulic pressure.
One of these was missing. Again,
it was generally agreed upon by the experts on the scene that this had no
relevance to the incident. In fact, the
excavator was put through a series of rigorous tests in an unsuccessful attempt
to get the hydraulic coupler to improperly release. No one has figured out what happened and the incident could not
be reproduced. Therefore, none of the
defects can be eliminated from possible causes. Hydraulic leaks, missing springs, and other known maintenance
issues, should be addressed immediately due to the increased potential for
equipment malfunction or failure.
Recommendation #4: Trenches deeper than five feet should have the walls
shored for workers protection.
Discussion #4: In this incident the victim was working in a trench
that was 6’4” deep with walls that were not shored, which put both him and his
co-worker at risk in the event of a cave-in.
OSHA regulation 29CFR 1926.652 (a)(1)2 states that employees
in an excavation shall be
protected from cave-ins by
an adequate protective system designed in accordance with OSHA
specifications. This pertains to all
excavations. Permissible exclusions to
this are when excavations are made entirely in stable rock, or in excavations
less than five feet in depth that have been examined by a competent person and
no indication of potential cave-in is seen.
References
1.
KRS
338.031 (1)(a) Obligations of employers and employees. Kentucky Revised Statutes.
2.
29
CFR 1926.652 (a)(1) Requirements for protective systems. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration. U.S. Department of
Labor.

KENTUCKY
INJURY PREVENTION AND RESEARCH CENTER
OCCUPATIONAL INJURY
PREVENTION PROGRAM
FACE Project
Report Request Form
Please send copies of FACE investigation reports,
as indicated below, to:
Name:____________________________________________________________
Organization:______________________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________________________
City:__________________________________
State:____________ Zip:__________________
Format Desired: Paper_________ Disk (WordPerfect format)________
Please check each report on the list below that you
would like to receive and send this form to: KY FACE Project, 333 Waller
Avenue, Suite 202, Lexington KY 40504-2915; or FAX to (859) 257-3909. If you need additional information, please
contact Mike Pope at (859) 257-4955, or (within Kentucky) (800) 204-3223.
Fatality Investigation
Reports:
_____ 94KY029 Tree
Trimmer Dies After 50 Foot Fall While In Bucket Truck
_____ 94KY038 Logger
Killed When Struck by Log That Rolled off Truck During Unloading Operation
_____ 94KY040 Tractor
Overturn Kills Farmer
_____ 94KY043 Part-time
Farmer Dies After Tractor Leaves Public Roadway and Overturns
_____ 94KY044 Part-Time
Farmer Drowns In Pond After Tractor Rollover
_____ 94KY045 Part-Time
Farmer Dies After Pick-up Truck Overturns
_____ 94KY051 Demolition
Foreman Dies After 35 Foot Fall Through Hole in Flat Roof
_____ 94KY059 Farmer
Dies After Being Run Over By Tractor While Checking Gas Wells
_____ 94KY063 Farmer
Is Run Over By Tractor After Losing Control on a Public Roadway
_____ 94KY078 Farmer
is Killed After Being Run Over By Wagon
_____ 94KY084 Part-time
Farmer is Killed After Losing Control of His Tractor
_____ 94KY090 Farm
Worker is Killed in Tractor Rollover
_____ 94KY091 Part-Time
Farmer is Killed in ROPS-Equipped Tractor Rollover
_____ 94KY097 Farm
Tractor Overturns Crushing Part-time Farmer
_____ 94KY100 Farmer
Killed When Tractor Overturns
_____ 94KY111 Farmer
Struck by Truck and Killed on Public Roadway
_____ 94KY115 Farmer
Pinned When Tractor Overturns Into Dry Creek Bed
_____ 94KY124 Retiree
Killed When Tractor Overturns
_____ 94KY144 Retiree
Dies After Tractor Overturns into Creek
_____ 94KY161 Log
Loader Runs Over Worker at Stave Mill
_____ 95KY011 Farmer
Killed When Run Over by Tractor in Barn
_____ 95KY015 Prison
Employee Killed in Tractor Rollover
_____ 95KY017 Retiree/Part-time
Farmer Killed When Run Over by Bush Hog
_____ 95KY030 86-Year-Old
Farmer is Killed After Being Hit By Tree Branch
_____ 95KY039 Farmer
Killed in Tractor Rollover
_____ 95KY043 Farmer
Killed After Tractor Overturns Into Creek Bed
_____ 95KY046 Farmer
is Run Over by Disc After Falling from Tractor
_____ 95KY047 Retiree
Dies in Tractor Rollover
_____ 95KY050 Farmer
Run Over After Falling From Tractor
_____ 95KY055 Farmer
Crushed in Hay Baler
_____ 95KY068 Welder
Crushed by Unmanned Pipelayer
_____ 95KY073 Logger
Killed in Endloader Rollover
_____ 95KY078 Logger
Killed by Falling Snag
_____ 95KY088 Farm
Worker Killed in Tractor Rollover on Public Roadway
_____ 95KY089 Logger
Killed in Bulldozer Rollover
_____ 95KY102 Logger
Killed When Log Rolls Off Truck at Sawmill
_____ 95KY110 Log
Rolls Off Truck During Unloading and Strikes Logger
_____ 95KY122 Farmworker
Killed When Caught in Power Take-Off (PTO)
_____ 95KY126 Farmer
Dies in Cornpicker
_____ 96KY009 Farmer
Strangled by Jacket Caught on Exposed Auger Shaft
_____ 96KY018 Worker
Killed in Fall from Oil Tank
_____ 96KY019 Logger
Killed by Falling Snag
_____ 96KY028 Welder
is Crushed by Rock Chipper
_____ 96KY037 Farmer
Killed When Thrown from Tractor
_____ 96KY046 Logs
Roll off Truck at Sawmill, Killing Truck Driver
_____ 96KY049 Maintenance
Worker Killed in 25-foot Fall from I-Beam
_____ 96KY050 Front
End Loader Overturns on Seed/Fertilizer Store Owner
_____ 96KY071 Farmer
Killed When Caught in Hay Baler
_____ 96KY073 Farmer
Killed When Crushed by Tractor
_____ 96KY077 Mill
Owner Dies in Tractor Rollover
_____ 96KY085 Retired
Farmer Thrown From and Run Over by Tractor
_____ 96KY088 Farmer
Killed in Tractor Rollover
_____ 96KY089 Logger
Killed by Falling Snag
_____ 96KY093 Welder
Dies after 30-foot Fall from Steel Structure
_____ 96KY102 Logger
Killed When Struck by Tree
_____ 96KY105 Hunting
Preserve Operator Crushed By Rotary Cutter
_____ 96KY106 Logger
Killed in Skidder Rollover
_____ 96KY122 Sawmill
Worker Killed by Circular Saw
_____ 96KY125 Pug
Mill Operator Killed After Entanglement
_____ 97KY008 Farmer
Killed on Tractor During Logging Operations
_____ 97KY016 Farmer
Killed When Tractor Turns Over
_____ 97KY018 Logger
Killed During Tree Felling
_____ 97KY019 Farmer
Killed When Tractor Overturns on Embankment
_____ 97KY028 Farmer
Killed When Tractor Slides Over Embankment While Mowing
_____ 97KY029 Rear
Tractor Rollover Kills Farmer
_____ 97KY031 Logger
Killed when Struck By Tree Limb During Hauling
_____ 97KY032 Bulldozer
Operator Killed in Rollover
_____ 97KY044 Tractor/Baler
Operator Killed in Entanglement
_____ 97KY071 Professional
Roofer Dies in Fall
_____ 97KY073 Logger
Crushed During Repair Work on Skidder
_____ 97KY080 Farmer
Run Over by Rotary Mower
_____ 97KY093 Farmer
Killed in Tractor Rollover
_____ 97KY110 Skidder
Operator Thrown from Vehicle During Rollover
_____ 97KY111 Construction
Worker Dies in Seven-Foot Fall
_____ 97KY122 Dislodged
Tree Strikes Logger
_____ 98KY014 Electrician
Dies in 6-foot Fall from Ladder
_____ 98KY018 Farmer
Dies When Caught Beneath Overturned Tractor
_____ 98KY024 Farmer
Run Over by Tractor
_____ 98KY031 Factory
Worker Caught in Overhead Conveyor While Hanging Transformers
_____ 98KY044 Factory
Worker Entangled in Conveyor Belt Rollers
_____ 98KY046 Tractor
Operator Killed by Rotary Mower while Mowing Highway Right-of-Way
_____ 98KY049 53-year-old
Dies in Tricycle Tractor Overturn while Transporting Round Bale
_____ 98KY056 66-year-old
Male Dies in Tractor Overturn While Mowing
_____ 98KY063 Logger
Fatally Injured by Falling Limb
_____ 98KY072 Farmer
Killed When Tractor Punctures Gas Line Causing an Explosion
_____ 98KY077 Tractor
Driver Killed in Overturn While Mowing
_____ 98KY099 Knotted
Log Rolls Off Truck and Kills Logger at Sawmill
_____ 98KY103 Log
Rolls off Truck at Sawmill Killing Employee
_____ 98KY106 Log
Rolls off Truck at Sawmill Killing the Truck Driver
_____ 98KY115 Lumber
Company Employee Falls 48" From Storage Rack to his Death
_____ 98KY116 Road
Construction Worker Killed in Tractor Overturn
_____ 00KY051 Logger
Fatally Injured by Falling Tree
Appendix
C
Evaluation of KY FACE
Project
16th Annual
Governor’s Safety and Health Conference and Exposition on May 11, 2000
The Kentucky Fatality Assessment and Control
Evaluation (KY FACE) Project conducted a presentation at the 16th Annual
Governor’s Safety and Health Conference and Exposition on May 11, 2000, and
administered surveys to obtain valuable feedback on the project and its
efforts. Thirty-three surveys were
collected after the discussion. Results
are summarized below.
Most (87%) of the participants were not aware
of KY FACE before the presentation.
Almost all of the participants (90%) indicated that they had a better
understanding of the occupational fatality problem in Kentucky after the
presentation (60% agreed and 30% strongly agreed). Again, almost all of the participants (95%) thought the
presentation was easy to understand (52% agreed and 46% strongly agreed). Over half (60%) agreed that the presentation
had prompted them to change safety practices at their worksite (48% agreed and
18% strongly agreed). Of the
participants surveyed over half (64%) agreed that the presentation was valuable
to their work (49% agreed and 15% strongly agreed). Interestingly, although four of the participants (12%) indicated
that they did not think the presentation was valuable, two of these
participants stated that the presentation had prompted them to change safety
practices at their worksite and a third participant stated that he/she would
pass along ROPS information to employees.
These answers are contradictory, suggesting that perhaps the question
regarding value should be reworded.
The
participants made several different comments on what they liked best and least
about the presentation. One participant
said, “the two presenters did a super job of laying out each situation” and
another said he/she feels “inspired to use as safety topic for newsletter.” Many said they liked the information and the
statistics. There were several
suggestions to improve the presentations.
A few suggested that lawnmower safety be included as well as having more
information/specifics on other injuries/fatalities in the workplace. Many of the participants were laborers or
administrators, however the professions of the participants were varied.
Appendix
D